Is coronary angiography necessary for vascular surgery patients who have positive results of dipyridamole thallium scans?

PURPOSE: Because dipyridamole thallium (DT) scanning is a useful predictor of perioperative cardiac events, a positive results of a DT scan is frequently the basis for performing more invasive cardiac evaluation and for consideration for performing coronary revascularization procedures before performing peripheral vascular surgery. The rationale for this approach has been that the treatment of anatomically significant coronary artery disease would lower the risk of performing a subsequent vascular operation. However, the benefit of performing aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac procedures in such patients remains unproved. To examine this issue, data from patients who underwent coronary angiography because of thallium redistribution were compared with data from matched control subjects who underwent peripheral vascular operations without further cardiac evaluation. METHODS: The medical records of 70 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography because of the presence of two or more segments of redistribution on DT scan were reviewed and compared with 70 other patients matched with respect to age, gender, peripheral vascular operation, and number of segments of redistribution on DT scan who did not undergo additional cardiac evaluation. RESULTS: DT scans were performed on 934 preoperative peripheral vascular surgery patients to help in the assessment of operative risk. Ischemic responses, defined as two or more segments of redistribution, were observed in 297. Of these, 70 underwent cardiac catheterization and 25 underwent coronary revascularization procedures. Adverse outcomes affected 46% of the coronary angiography group and 44% of the control group (p = NS). Patients who underwent coronary angiography and were considered for myocardial revascularization had fewer cardiac events with a subsequent vascular operation than did the control subjects. However, any possible benefit from invasive cardiac evaluation was offset by the three deaths and two myocardial infarctions (MIs) that complicated the cardiac evaluation. There was no significant difference between the angiography group and the matched control subjects with respect to perioperative nonfatal MI (13% vs 9%), fatal MI (4% vs 3%), late nonfatal MI (16% vs 19%), or late cardiac death (10% vs 13%). In long-term follow-up, MIs occurred later in patients who underwent coronary angiography than the control subjects (p = 0.049), but this difference was not associated with an improvement in the overall survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: The risks of extended cardiac evaluation and treatment did not produce any improvement in either the perioperative or the long-term survival rate. For most vascular surgery patients who have a positive result of a DT scan, coronary angiography does not provide any additional useful information.