Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics and renal clearance of didanosine during once and twice daily dosing in HIV-1 infected individuals

OBJECTIVE: To compare the plasma pharmacokinetics of didanosine during once daily (qd) and twice daily (bid) dosing. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, cross-over study. METHODS: HIV-1 infected patients who used didanosine were randomized to either a qd or a bid dosing regimen of didanosine. The total daily dose of didanosine was identical in both regimens. Seven days after the start of the study, the pharmacokinetic profile of didanosine in plasma and urine was assessed during an 8-h period. The next day, the patient was switched to the opposite dosing regimen, and after another 7 days, the study was concluded by again assessing the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of didanosine during 8 h. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients completed the study. The pharmacokinetics of didanosine in plasma (with maximum plasma concentration adjusted for dose) and urine were not significantly different in the qd and bid dosing regimen (P > 0.28 for all parameters). CONCLUSION: We conclude that qd dosing of didanosine leads to a similar exposure in plasma as bid dosing (using the same total daily dose). Since qd dosing may lead to improved compliance of patients to regimens containing didanosine, these results provide a rationale for prescribing didanosine in a qd regimen, and is reassuring when we realize that the drug is being administered in a qd dosing regimen on a large scale in clinical practice.     

A relatively small change in sodium chloride concentration has a strong effect on adhesion of ocular bacteria to contact lenses

We studied the effect of the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor asymmetric dimethyl arginine (ADMA) and the inactive enantiomer N G-methyl-D-arginine (D-NMMA) on Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the respiratory mucosa in nasal turbinate organ cultures. We also investigated the effect of P. aeruginosa culture filtrate on the expression of inducible NOS (iNOS) messenger RNA (mRNA) by an epithelial cell line (A549). Organ cultures were preincubated with ADMA (0.1 to 4 x 10(-4) M) or D-NMMA (2 x 10(-4) M) for 30 min prior to bacterial infection. Infected organ cultures (8 h) had significantly (P <= 0.05) greater epithelial damage and fewer ciliated and unciliated cells than did control cultures. There was an increased level of nitrite in the medium feeding infected organ cultures as compared with control cultures. ADMA significantly (P <= 0.05) reduced both bacterially induced epithelial damage and loss of ciliated cells in a concentration-dependent manner. D-NMMA did not influence the effect of P. aeruginosa infection of the mucosa. ADMA, but not D-NMMA, significantly (P <= 0.04) reduced total bacterial numbers adherent to the respiratory mucosa. P. aeruginosa culture filtrates (24 h and 36 h) significantly (P = 0.02) increased iNOS with respect to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA expression. These results show that P. aeruginosa stimulates iNOS expression by a cell line and NO production by an organ culture. ADMA reduces mucosal damage and loss of ciliated cells, which suggests that NO may be a mediator of epithelial damage caused by P. aeruginosa.     

Acute effects of estradiol infusion and naloxone on luteinizing hormone secretion in pubertal boys

We have shown previously in pubertal boys that testosterone (T) suppresses the nocturnal augmentation of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion principally by decreasing LH pulse frequency. As T can be aromatised to estradiol (E2), and E2 effects on LH secretory dynamics may be separate from those of T, we examined the effects of acute E2 infusion on LH secretion in pubertal boys. Opioid receptor blockade has been reported to increase LH secretion after estradiol suppression in adult men, so we also examined whether naloxone might augment LH secretion during E2 treatment in pubertal boys. Starting at 1000 h, eight pubertal boys were given a 33 h saline infusion, followed 1 week later by an E2 infusion at 4.6 nmol/m2/h. During both infusions, four iv boluses of saline were given hourly beginning at 1200 h on the first day, and four naloxone iv boluses, 0.1 mg/kg each, were given hourly beginning at 1200 h on the second day. Blood was obtained every 15 min for LH, and every 60 min for T and E2, from 1200 h until the end of the infusion. Pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) was assessed after both infusions by iv administration of 250 ng/kg synthetic GnRH. Estradiol infusion increased the mean plasma E2 concentration from 23 +/- 4 to 46 +/- 6 pmol/L (P < 0.01) and suppressed mean plasma T from 4.9 +/- 1.4 to 3.0 +/- 3.5 nmol/L (saline vs. E2 infusion, P < 0.05). The overall mean LH was suppressed by E2 infusion from 3.7 +/- 0.5 to 2.2 +/- 0.4 IU/L (saline vs. E2 infusion, P < 0.01). LH pulse frequency was suppressed by 50%, whereas mean LH pulse amplitude was not different between saline and E2 infusions. Administration of naloxone did not alter the mean LH, LH pulse frequency, or amplitude during either saline or E2 infusions. Pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH was similar during both infusions. These studies indicate that E2 produces its negative feedback in pubertal boys principally by suppression of LH pulse frequency, and naloxone does not reverse these suppressive effects. Thus E2 suppression of LH secretion is mediated by a decrease of hypothalamic GnRH secretion that is independent of endogenous opioid pathways.     

Antibiotic optimization. An evaluation of patient safety and economic outcomes

BACKGROUND: Although numerous reports have described interventions designed to influence antibiotic utilization, to our knowledge none have been evaluated in a randomized study. METHODS: Adult inpatients receiving 1 or more of 10 designated parenteral antibiotics for 3 or more days during a 3-month period were randomized to an intervention (n = 141) and a control (n = 111) group using an unblocked, computer-generated random number table. Obstetric patients and those seen in infectious disease consultation were excluded. The intervention group received antibiotic-related suggestions from a team consisting of an infectious disease fellow and a clinical pharmacist. Both groups were evaluated for clinical and microbiological outcomes as well as antibiotic utilization via prospective chart reviews and analysis of the hospital's administrative database. RESULTS: Sixty-two (49%) of the intervention group patients received a total of 74 suggestions. Sixty-three (84%) of these suggestions were implemented; the majority involved changes in antibiotic choice, dosing regimen, or route of administration. Per patient antibiotic charges were nearly $400 less in the intervention group vs controls (P = .05). Almost all the savings were related to lower intravenous antibiotic charges. Clinical and microbiological response, antibiotic-associated toxic effects, in-hospital mortality, and readmission rates were similar for both groups. Multiple linear regression analysis identified randomization to the intervention group and female sex as the sole predictors of lower antibiotic charges. There was a trend toward a shorter length of stay for the intervention group (20 vs 24.7 days, P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomized study to evaluate whether antibiotic choices can be influenced in a cost-effective fashion without sacrificing patient safety. We demonstrate that 50% of patients initially treated with expensive parenteral antibiotics can have their regimens refined after 3 days of therapy and that these modifications result in good clinical outcomes with a substantial reduction in antibiotic expense.