语言符号任意性与象似性之争及其实质

纵观国内语言学界近20年来的争论,关于语言符号的性质,主要有三种看法:任意说、象似说、辩证说。争论主要集中在对“任意性“和“象似性“理解的分歧、象似性与任意性是否完全对立、音义之间是否是完全任意的等等。争论过程中,持任意观的学者往往用他们所理解的“任意性“来辩驳他们所认为的、范围缩小了的“象似性“;持象似观的学者往往用他们所理解的“象似性“来辩驳他们所认为的、范围扩大了的“任意性“。因此,语言符号任意性与象似性之争的实质,很大程度上是站在不同的哲学背景下对语言符号、任意性和象似性不同理解的争论。     

企业防范劳动争议的思考

防范劳动争议风险，是关系企业和谐稳定发展和员工切身权益的大事。结合工会工作和劳动争议调解工作实践，联系企业实际情况，对可能存在的风险点逐一分析，有针对性地提出了防范措施和办法，以期为劳动管理、劳动风险控制提供借鉴。     

长江流域省际河流中水事纠纷冲突与对策措施

以长江流域为例,对现有的省际河流中水事纠纷的冲突类型、特征及存在问题进行了分析,提出流域一体化管理、加强法律法规建设、引入市场经济机制、运用水权水市场理论指导水事纠纷等对策措施。     

从争端裁决(DAB)条款的发展看FIDIC争端解决机制的完善

回顾争端裁决(DAB)出现前单一的争端解决机制,DRB对DAB的影响,以及DAB对争端解决的贡献及不足。在此基础上,通过对FIDIC(2017)索赔和DAAB条款的分析,以及该条款在纠纷预防、索赔程序、索赔证据与时效等方面的论证,认为FIDIC的最新发展进一步强调了DAAB争端解决机制的重要性,明确了预防争端发生的环节,在争端解决处理上融入证据与时效理念,使FIDIC争端解决机制更加完善。     

对《建设工程施工合同》中几个条款的建议

对比FIDIC施工合同条件,指出了我国建设工程施工合同示范文本中几个条款中的不足,并提出了改进的相应建议。改进后的合同更加完备,将有利于减少合同履行中纠纷的出现。     

“双重冲击”下世界油菜籽及其加工品生产、贸易格局变动分析

近年爆发的贸易争端与新冠肺炎疫情,对世界油菜籽及其加工品的生产、贸易格局产生了一定影响,研究这一问题对保障中国油菜籽及其加工品进口供应链安全具有重要意义。总结分析了世界油菜籽及其加工品生产、贸易格局变动特征,实证分析了主要进出口国(地区)的显示性比较优势与贸易互补性,探讨了贸易争端与新冠肺炎疫情对世界油菜籽及其加工品生产、贸易格局的“双重冲击”。主要结论为：中长期看,“双重冲击”不会大幅改变基于比较优势的世界油菜籽及其加工品的生产、贸易格局;短期内,进出口大国之间的贸易争端将加剧国别替代,中国与加拿大、俄罗斯、澳大利亚的贸易规模将逐渐此消彼长;新冠肺炎疫情增加了贸易成本和供应链风险,对提升跨国物流与供应链绩效提出了更高要求。     

施工企业常见合同纠纷及对策的探讨

结合工作实践,对工程量清单模式实施以来施工企业常见合同纠纷问题进行了分析,提出了相应的应对对策,并指出施工企业要通过加强合同管理,来维护企业的合法权益。     

Accredited online dispute resolution services: creating European legal standards for ensuring fair and effective processes

The aim of this article is to consider the need for regulation within the European Union (EU) in order to close the existing gap between the need for effective and fair online dispute resolution (ODR) mechanisms in electronic commerce and their actual use. At present, ODR relies on soft laws and self-regulation rather than legislative intervention. Yet, some aspects, such as mandatory ODR clauses included in electronic contracts and the enforceability of online awards, need to be supported by legislation and cannot be left exclusively to self-regulatory initiatives. This article suggests that establishing clear procedural standards in the ODR field will increase awareness as well as provide the necessary tools for promoting those ODR schemes that offer quality services by accrediting them with a pan-European trustmark. The article proposes that this can be achieved through a European directive, which will contribute to the development of ODR within the EU by allowing accredited ODR providers to offer mandatory services and issue enforceable decisions.

Whether many disputes will be resolved online is not a matter of ‘If’, but of ‘When’ and ‘How’. The question of exactly when is not of great importance; time will tell. The question of ‘How’ is what we should focus on. (Lodder 2006 Lodder, A. 2006. The third party and beyond: An analysis of the different parties, in particular the fifth, involved in online dispute resolution. Information and Communications Technology Law, 15(2): 143[Taylor & Francis Online] [Google Scholar]: 153)     

论我国劳动争议仲裁制度的完善

仲裁是解决争议的有效方法.我国的劳动争议仲裁制度及相关法规还存在许多问题,因此影响了劳动争议的及时、公正的处理.应当修改<劳动法>、<仲裁法>和<工会法>等相关的法律规定,完善劳动争议仲裁制度.     

The appropriate role of dispute resolution in building trust online

This article examines the relationship between online dispute resolution (ODR) and trust. We discuss what trust is, why trust is important, and how trust develops. Our claim is that efforts to implement online dispute resolution on a site or service in a manner that promotes trust need to consider ODR as just one tool in a broader toolbox of trust-building tools and techniques. These techniques are amongst others marketing, education, trust seals, and transparency. By evaluating ODR in its proper context as one component of a larger trust strategy, we can more accurately set expectations for its results and position our projects for success.“Trust in Allah, but tie your camel” – Muslim Proverb