CIVA仿真软件的实际应用

CIVA仿真软件包含超声、涡流和射线三个部分,其中超声部分又分为声场模拟和缺陷响应两个模块。CIVA可以支持各种复杂的工件建模,可设置多种类型探头,包括相控阵探头,能够模拟多种检测方法,对于检测工艺的制定有着很好的指导作用。着重介绍了CIVA软件在国内无损检测领域中的成功案例。     

遗传蚁群算法在软件测试用例生成中的应用

针对传统软件测试方法工作量大,测试过程重复性高等缺点,提出了一种新的软件测试用例生成方法。该方法基于蚁群算法和遗传算法,利用遗传算法与蚁群算法提取每组软件测试程序特征值,再经过选择、交叉和变异操作,获得软件测试用例的组合。实验结果证明：该算法具有隐性并行性和全局寻优能力,可在不降低速度的情况下提高软件测试用例生成的精度。     

基于典型机械产品案例《计算机图形学与CAD技术》课程实验教学方法与实践探索

针对《计算机图形学与CAD技术》课程教学实践性强、理论教学与实践难以一致等特点,对教学内容及方式进行了探索,提出了基于典型机械产品案例《计算机图形学与CAD技术》实验教学方法,即结合课堂教学内容,选择与工程实际接近的典型机械产品案例,编制详细的实验指导书,通过实践学习具有挑战性的实际工程案例,让学生能深刻理解课堂理论教学内容,并能对所学知识融会贯通,达到了培养学生实践能力与理论教学的统一.     

基于自适应共振理论(ART)网络的机床设备实例的分类

阐述了自适应共振理论(ART)网络的原理及训练算法.利用ART网络良好的自组织,自学习,可塑性强的特点,提出基于神经网络的机床设备实例分类的策略.该方法求解简单快速,容易实现,效率高,在实际工程中具有良好的应用前景.     

建筑工程投标报价技巧的案例分析

报价是工程投标的核心.报价过高,会失去中标机会;报价过低,即使中标,也会给企业带来亏本风险.施工企业应从宏观角度对工程总报价进行控制,力求报价适中,提高中标率,获得较好的经济效益.本文结合工程投标报价案例,分析报价技巧,说明灵活应用报价技巧在投标中的重要性.     

直接证据以及间接证据在火灾调查中的运用

火灾发生之后,除了对其进行及时的扑灭,保证相关人员以及财产的安全外,还需要开展相对应的火灾调查工作.在这个过程中,直接证据以及间接证据的发现和应用可以帮助工作人员了解火灾的发生、发展的情况,更加有效地开展火灾调查工作.但在实际火灾调查中,直接证据以及间接证据存在差异性,将这两种证据进行有效的融合,能够帮助工作人员更加快速地查明火灾产生的原因,明确责任人.文章针对直接证据以及间接证据用于火灾调查中的具体运用进行分析.     

Editorial.

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law focuses on the links between psychology as a science, relevant information derived from related disciplines as sciences, and public policy and law. It will publish articles that (1) critically evaluate the actual and potential contributions of psychology to public policy and legal issues, (2) assess the desirability of different public policy and legal alternatives in light of the scientific knowledge base in psychology, (3) articulate research needs that address public policy and legal issues for which there is currently insufficient theoretical and empirical knowledge, and (4) examine public policy and legal issues relating to the conduct of psychology and of related disciplines where relevant to psychology. The goals for the journal are to (1) provide a multidisciplinary forum for scholarship and interchange relevant to the mission of the journal, (2) provide a forum for the publications of comprehensive, scholarly articles that critically consider theoretical, conceptual, and doctrinal issues or that critically review the literature on topics relevant to the mission of the journal, and (3) provide a forum for the publication of comprehensive, scholarly articles that report the results of programs of research or large-scale empirical studies relevant to the mission of the journal. This particular issue provides a forum for critical discussion of the implications of using a social science amicus brief in court cases. It also demonstrates the opportunity that this journal will provide to social scientists to critically evaluate their colleagues' work when those colleagues attempt to offer their science and opinions in the legal or public policy arenas. Finally, this issue reflects the journal's desire to be a flexible forum for scholarly interchange. Rather than always publishing articles that are relatively independent of each other, the journal will also publish issues devoted to a single theme (as occurred in the first issue of this volume), and, as in the case of this issue, to interchange about one theme when it is appropriate for advancing the field. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Evaluation of child witnesses for confrontation by criminal defendants": Erratum.

Reports an error in the original article by M. A. Small and G. B. Melton (Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 1994[August], Vol 25[3], 228–233). Footnote 1 incorrectly indicates that the Craig brief was written without the aid of private legal counsel. Though the brief in question was written with more APA member involvement than has been the case for other briefs, private legal counsel participated and was listed as a coauthor. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1994-43476-001.) States have passed legislation governing the procedures by which children may testify in cases of child abuse. In Maryland v. Craig (1990), the US Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of these procedures. As a result, psychologists may be asked to perform evaluations regarding the potential trauma a child faces in confronting a defendant in a criminal case. Specifically, opinions of psychologists may be sought as to the potential trauma a child may endure as a result of a face-to-face confrontation with a defendant. Research relevant to this assessment is reviewed, and it is suggested that psychologists may be of most help in preparing children to testify.… (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

INTOOLS仪表设计软件的选择分析

介绍INTOOLS仪表设计软件的组成及功能,分析该软件成为目前世界上在仪表设计领 域运用比较广泛的仪表集成设计软件之一的原因,以及我们选择此软件实际应用的理由和价值。