共建校企联合实验室,提高研究生创新能力

共建产学研合作联合实验室,建立研究生创新能力培养的平台,是高素质人才培养的重要途径。课题组结合重庆地方产业实际和企业自主创新能力建设的需要,建立了校企共建联合实验室,并建设成为了重庆市级企业技术中心和国家级企业技术中心,提高了学生的综合素质,取得了较好的研究成果,为企业带来了良好的经济效益。为增强产学研合作的力度,改革高校对教师和学生考核方式,建立合理的激励机制是值得探索的问题。     

论高校内部权力

本文从释解权力的概念着手,较为详细地分析了高校内部权力的类型、来源与作用方式。文章认为,高校内部的最基本权力除了行政权力、学术权力和学生权力之外,有时还存在政党权力,但由于各国的政治体制和历史传统不同,高校内部的主导性权力,可能各不相同。此外,来自社会的市场力量,也会对高校内部权力结构及权力相互制衡模式产生一定的影响。     

大学新生政治认知的调查研究

大学生对政治的认知状况是对其进行思想政治教育的重要依据。这次对266名大学新生就政治概念、政治信仰、政治选择、政治意向、政治兴趣等问题进行了问卷调查结果表明：从整体上看，大学新生的政治认知呈现出自发的不成熟的状态。其原因是：政治信息传播的内容与形式欠完善；大学新生对政治信息的摄取与繁殖存在非理性化倾向。大学的思想政治教育在内容与方法上应作进一步的改革：课程教学上应加强与充实政权建设、政党建设、政治体制改革等政治信息内容；课余创造条件让学生能及时了解国家时事政策的动向；倡导研究型的学习；积极发展学生党员；将新生的政治素质与人格发展结合起来。     

论大学的学生意识及神圣责任

学生是大学存在的决定因素，大学作用学生的关系实质是服务。当前我国大学的学生意识状况不容乐观。面向时代潮流，追求大学真朴本性、反思和完善我们的学生观已是大学的一项紧迫任务。大学应在清晰的学生意识中尽力承担好善待学生，多出人才的神圣使命。     

诚:进德修业之本

诚在中国传统美德中占有重要地位,被尊为“进德修业之本”、“立人之道”和“立政之本”。诚也是当代大学生就有的基本德性,诚德修养的水平直接影响到大学生的立身做人、求知求学与创业成才。要提高大学生诚德修养的水平,必须培养大学生对诚德的信念,加强教育引导,净化社会道德风气。     

建材高职学生创新意识现状分析

在对1000份高职学院学生进行的问卷调查的基础上,从独立性、批判性和探索性方面对高职学生的创新意识现状进行了分析,指出了存在的一些问题,并提出了相应的措施。     

我国留学生发展现状与对策研究

我国接收和培养外国留学生工作已经进入机遇与挑战并存的阶段。教育国际化大潮以及我国经济、文化的优势为吸引留学生提供了前所未有的机遇,但面临的国际竞争也前所未有。我们应充分利用政策优势,开展双语教学,提高办学层次,加强毕业生联系,大力发展留学生教育工作。     

谈一幢学生宿舍楼供暖系统的改造

常用的上供下回式和水平串联式供暖系统虽然各有特点，但在设计时一定要根据建筑物的用途、特点选用，才能达到理想的运行效果。笔者针对一幢学生宿舍楼上供下回式供暖系统运动中存在的问题，将原系统形式改为水平串联式系统。工程改造简单，工期短，改造后系统运行管理方便、节能。     

Within-school social comparison: How students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept.

Results from prior research indicate that a student’s academic self-concept is negatively influenced by the achievement of others in his or her school (a frame of reference effect) and that this negative frame of reference effect is not or only slightly reduced by the quality, standing, or prestige of the track or school attended (a “reflected glory” effect). Going beyond prior studies, the present research used both between-school and within-school approaches to investigate frame of reference and reflected glory effects in education, incorporating students’ own perceptions of the standing of their school and class. Multilevel analyses were performed with data from 3 large-scale assessments with 4,810, 1,502, and 4,247 students, respectively. Findings from all 3 studies showed that, given comparable individual achievement, placement in high-achieving learning groups was associated with comparatively low academic self-concepts. However, students’ academic self-concept was not merely a reflection of their relative position within the class but also substantively associated with their individual and shared perceptions of the class’s standing. Moreover, the negative effects of being placed in high-achieving learning groups were weaker for high-achieving students. Overall, the studies support both educational and social psychology theorizing on social comparison. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Development and validation of a measure of academic entitlement: Individual differences in students’ externalized responsibility and entitled expectations.

Four studies present the validation of a self-report scale capturing academic entitlement, which is defined as the tendency to possess an expectation of academic success without a sense of personal responsibility for achieving that success. The Academic Entitlement scale possesses a 2-factor structure (Study 1); 10 items measure students’ Externalized Responsibility for their academic success, and 5 items measure students’ self-serving Entitled Expectations about professors and course policies. In Study 2, the Externalized Responsibility subscale correlated positively with related measures of entitlement, grandiosity, and narcissism, and it was negatively related to self-esteem, personal control, need for cognition, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. In Study 3, participants rated various responses to academic situations selected by university instructors as highly inappropriate or highly appropriate. The Academic Entitlement scale predicted students’ ratings of the appropriateness of these student behaviors as well as the likelihood that they themselves would engage in these behaviors. In a laboratory setting, individuals with high Academic Entitlement scores evaluated the researcher more negatively than those with low Academic Entitlement scores (Study 4). Practical applications are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)