介孔分子筛孔尺寸表征方法比较

MCM-41是由表面活性剂十六烷基三甲基溴化铵为模板剂经水热合成，550℃煅烧5h制备的规则硅质六方介摘要孔材料；Ti-MCM-41是在MCM-41的基础上，将Ti离子涂敷引入到MCM-41的介孔中合成的。该类材料孔尺寸的表征方法有N2吸附、透射电镜TEM、SAXS等，其中N2吸附、透射电镜是传统的介孔尺寸的表征方法，SAXS是近年新的介孔尺寸的表征方法。比较了Ti-MCM-41材料的孔尺寸的表征方法，得出：SAXS得到的Ti-MCM-41孔径与TEM照片的结果符合较好，但与N2吸附的结果偏差较大。SAXS、TEM、N2吸附-脱附等温线给出的Ti-MCM-41的平均孔径分别为2.00nm、2.15nm、3.60nm。     

大量程步进式垂线坐标仪的研制

步进式变形监测仪器具有长期测量、测值稳定、可靠性高、测试原理简单、适用范围广等优点，在中国的大坝安全监测领域得到了广泛应用，但大量程步进式变形监测仪器的研制很难。文中介绍了一种新型步进式垂线坐标仪，该垂线坐标仪在引入独特的结构设计、先进的电子测量技术和优化的电机驱动控制策略的基础上，很好地解决了大量程工况下的高精度测量问题。     

电大尺寸导体附近线天线的辐射方向图研究

采用一致性几何绕射理论分析了电大尺寸导体对其附近的对称振子天线辐射方向图的影响,计算了在三种不同环境下的天线方向图,结果与软件(FEKO)仿真结果吻合良好.为分析工程中复杂的电大尺寸目标,提供了重要的参考依据.     

大转动平面梁有限元分析的共旋坐标法

虽然大转动平面梁单元已有很多,但其中许多太复杂,缺乏计算效率,值得改进。采用共旋坐标法准确的首次导出了平面梁单元发生大转动小应变时的非对称单元切线刚度矩阵,利用这一非对称的单元切线刚度矩阵由Newton-Raphson迭代法编制了一个FORTRAN程序NPFSAP,并获得了大转动梁、方形和圆形框架的高精度数值解,表明了这种非线性单元列式的正确性和非线性求解过程的收敛性,非对称单元切线刚度矩阵值得推介。     

大型浮体水弹性作用的频域分析

对大型浮体水弹性响应的频域计算方法做了综述和介绍。分别介绍了干模态法、湿模态法和直接计算方法,对于干模态法的五种结构弹性模态函数做了介绍,研究了五种模态函数下计算结果的收敛速度。对于水动力分析方法的计算量和存储量做了分析,介绍了降低计算量和存储量的一些新计算方法,实现了一种柱坐标下的多极子展开高阶边界元方法,积分方程中的固角系数和柯西主值积分均采用直接方法计算,应用该方法计算了波浪与大型弹性浮体的相互作用问题,计算结果与实验值得到很好的吻合。     

弯管传感器弯径比的三坐标测量方法

对ZWL型智能弯管流量计中弯管传感器弯径比测量方法地不断探索,提出了用三坐标测量机对弯管传感器进行测量的三坐标测量方法.通过建立求解弯径比的数学模型,三坐标测量机测取三维坐标点和用MATLAB软件编写弯径比的计算软件,完成了对弯径比的计算.此方法是将测头直接伸入管内的接触式测量,能直接反映弯管的形状特征,测量结果具有较高的精度,且操作方便,具有通用性.     

大口径方管排辊成形工艺的仿真分析

针对四道次滚模压制大口径方形管成形工艺，采用有限元仿真软件ANSYS／DYNA对冷拔、推挤和滚轧进行仿真和比较分析，揭示各工艺成形的形状变形特点和作用力变化规律，为优选成型工艺参数提供了基础。     

高碳钢盘条缩径原因的研究

用扫描电镜、大型金相显微镜观察分析高碳钢盘条的缩径，结果表明：造成缩径的主要原因是盘条中的非金属夹杂物超标、方坯偏析和缩孔。根据这一结果,提出了改善高碳钢盘条质量的措施和建议。     

Non‐linear finite element modal approach for the large amplitude free vibration of symmetric and unsymmetric composite plates

A theoretical analysis is presented for the large amplitude vibration of symmetric and unsymmetric composite plates using the non‐linear finite element modal reduction method. The problem is first reduced to a set of Duffing‐type modal equations using the finite element modal reduction method. The main advantage of the proposed approach is that no updating of the non‐linear stiffness matrices is needed. Without loss of generality, accurate frequency ratios for the fundamental mode and the higher modes of a composite plate at various values of maximum deflection are then determined by using the Runge–Kutta numerical integration scheme. The procedure for obtaining proper initial conditions for the periodic plate motions is very time consuming. Thus, an alternative scheme (the harmonic balance method) is adopted and assessed, as it was employed to formulate the large amplitude free vibration of beams in a previous study, and the results agreed well with the elliptic solution. The numerical results that are obtained with the harmonic balance method agree reasonably well with those obtained with the Runge–Kutta method. The contribution of each linear mode to the maximum deflection of a plate can also be obtained. The frequency ratios for isotropic and composite plates at various maximum deflections are presented, and convergence of frequencies with the number of finite elements, number of linear modes, and number of harmonic terms is also studied. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Stress integration and mesh refinement for large deformation in geomechanics

This paper first discusses alternative stress integration schemes in numerical solutions to large‐ deformation problems in hardening materials. Three common numerical methods, i.e. the total‐Lagrangian (TL), the updated‐Lagrangian (UL) and the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) methods, are discussed. The UL and the ALE methods are further complicated with three different stress integration schemes. The objectivity of these schemes is discussed. The ALE method presented in this paper is based on the operator‐split technique where the analysis is carried out in two steps; an UL step followed by an Eulerian step. This paper also introduces a new method for mesh refinement in the ALE method. Using the known displacements at domain boundaries and material interfaces as prescribed displacements, the problem is re‐analysed by assuming linear elasticity and the deformed mesh resulting from such an analysis is then used as the new mesh in the second step of the ALE method. It is shown that this repeated elastic analysis is actually more efficient than mesh generation and it can be used for general cases regardless of problem dimension and problem topology. The relative performance of the TL, UL and ALE methods is investigated through the analyses of some classic geotechnical problems. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.