应用低贫化放矿的可行性浅析

鉴于鲁中冶金矿山公司现行截止品位放矿方式中存在贫化率较大的问题，提出采用提高截止品位的低贫化放矿方式，通过技术经济指标的分析计算，认为低贫化放矿技术上可行，经济上合理，在现场易于实现，具有应用价值。     

多煤层开采相互采动的影响规律

针对平朔煤炭工业公司安家岭井工矿4号和9号煤层联合开采的特点，利用相似材料模拟和数值模拟两种手段研究了9号煤层开采对4号煤层工作面巷道的采动影响规律，以及在不同煤柱尺寸下9号煤层工作面推进过程中，4号煤层工作面巷道周围应力变化规律及巷道变形规律.同时优化煤柱尺寸，使4号煤层工作面巷道处于安全的采动影响范围之内.     

境界顶柱稳定性的数值模拟研究

露天转地下开采的矿山，其境界顶柱稳定性将直接影响到矿山的安全生产。本文以石人沟铁矿为例，运用ANSYS有限元分析软件，建立三维数值模型，模拟了动载荷作用下分步回采引起顶柱及采场的应力、变形情况，并对结果进行了详细的分析，得出了有价值的结论，有利于指导矿山的安全生产。     

沿脉进路无底分段崩落法的进路参数研究

分析了无底柱分段崩落法回采工作面放矿口尺寸对矿岩散体移动规律的影响，并根据椭球体放矿理论和随机介质放矿理论，得出了增大出矿口尺寸和全断面均匀放矿可改善矿石散体的移动条件进而增大矿石放出量的结论。将此结论应用到厚度中等及以下、倾角较大、下盘围岩不稳固矿体的无底柱分段崩落法开采实践中，其放矿效果明显改善，极大地提高了矿石回收率。     

阳泉三矿K8101回采工作面突水机理浅析

介绍了阳泉矿区在有同层积水威胁情况下开采 ,留设安全保护煤岩柱的方法和有关技术参数。     

Key technology study on pillar mining under the system of room and pillar mining

Taken taifeng coal mine in Mongolia for example, discussed the stability and controllability about advance pillars which locate at the front of working face and makes simulation on pillar with the software UDEC3.1. The failure styles of advance pillars are shear failure and compression failure through analyzing the stability of advance pillars. The paper concludes that can protect advance pillars from shear failure by controlling coefficient of volumetric expansion of mining field rock and supports＇ working resistance and can also protect it from compression failure by advance supporting, increasing setting pressure and working resistance. Two advance pillars are influenced and the main failure form is compression failure through the numerical simulation.     

浅埋近距离煤层开采房式煤柱群动态失稳致灾机制

针对我国西部矿区浅埋近距离煤层房采煤柱下开采时易发生工作面压架、地表台阶塌陷以及矿震灾害的现象，采用物理模拟及数值模拟方法对下煤层工作面采动时上覆房采煤柱群的动态失稳过程及工作面压架机理开展研究。实测统计榆阳区部分矿井本煤层房式开采后，只有当房采煤柱的弹性核区比例大于31%时，房采煤柱才能处于长期稳定。下煤层采后的模拟结果表明:上覆房采煤柱的破坏形式及其失稳次序同其与下煤层工作面相对位置密切相关，房采煤柱依次从工作面开切眼位置、工作面位置、采空区中部位置发生破坏及失稳，且工作面开切眼和工作面位置处煤柱多发生顺向采空区的斜切破坏，而采空区中部煤柱则发生垂向压裂破坏。根据石圪台煤矿数值模拟结果显示，上部2-2煤层房采后煤柱支承应力峰值由原岩应力2.8 MPa增大至12 MPa，应力集中系数为4.28;当下部3-1煤层工作面采后，上覆2-2煤层房采煤柱的支承应力峰值增大至30 MPa，应力集中系数达10.71;下煤层工作面开切眼侧与工作面正上方的房采煤柱呈现垂向不均匀承载特征以及受水平拉伸变形影响，是导致边界处房采煤柱易出现对角斜切破坏模式的主因。两侧边界煤柱失稳后，其顶板岩层瞬间发生整体拉剪破断从而引发矿震，顶板多层岩层以“整体运动”的形式急剧快速下沉并撞击底板，将采空区中部上方的房采煤柱压垮压塌，同时巨大的冲击力进而导致上下煤层间的岩层发生全厚切落，造成下煤层工作面发生切顶压架。实验发现从上覆房采煤柱群首个煤柱发生破坏至整体失稳运动并达到稳定，历时仅约为0.45 s，其中，上下煤层之间的岩层发生全厚切落历时仅约为0.05 s。     

汽车C柱左下护板顺序阀热流道倒推注塑模设计

根据汽车C柱左下护板的结构特点,设计了一副大型薄壁顺序阀控制的热流道注塑模具。模具采用动模成型外表面,定模成型内表面的倒推模结构,保证了成型塑件外观要求。模具采用双推杆和辅助杆斜顶侧向抽芯机构,解决了斜顶抽芯面积大、抽芯力大以及倾斜角度大的脱模难题。模具采用“直通式水管+倾斜式水管+隔片式水井”近乎随形水路的温度控制系统,水路布置均匀,模具冷却均衡充分,注射周期缩短了约15 %,成型塑件尺寸精度达到了MT3（GB/T 14486—2008）。     

综放沿空巷道围岩稳定性数值模拟研究

针对综放沿空巷道顶底板及两帮变形严重、稳定性差的问题,通过对沿空巷道失稳力学机理的分析,利用FLAC数值模拟软件,对支护与未支护条件下选取不同煤柱宽度时的沿空巷道底板下沉量及煤柱水平位移进行了模拟分析,得出在南岭公司303工作面地质条件下,煤柱宽度与沿空巷道底板下沉量及煤柱水平位移的关系,最终确定了最为合理的煤柱宽度。     

Pillar design and coal burst experience in Utah Book Cliffs longwall operations

Longwall mining has existed in Utah for more than half a century. Much of this mining occurred at depths of cover that significantly exceed those encountered by most other US longwall operations. Deep cover causes high ground stress, which can combine with geology to create a coal burst hazard. Nearly every longwall mine operating within the Utah's Book Cliffs coalfield has been affected by coal bursts. Pillar design has been a key component in the burst control strategies employed by mines in the Book Cliffs.Historically, most longwall mines employed double-use two-entry yield pillar gates. Double-use signifies that the gate system serves first as the headgate, and then later serves as the tailgate for the adjacent panel. After the 1996 burst fatality at the Aberdeen Mine, the inter-panel barrier design was introduced.In this layout, a wide barrier pillar protects each longwall panel from the previously mined panel, and each gate system is used just once. This paper documents the deep cover longwall mining conducted with each type of pillar design, together with the associated coal burst experience. Each of the six longwall mining complexes in the Book Cliffs having a coal burst history is described on a panel-by-panel basis.The analysis shows that where the mining depth exceeded 450 m, each design has been employed for about 38000 total m of longwall panel extraction. The double-use yield pillar design has been used primarily at depths less than 600 m, however, while the inter-panel barrier design has been used mainly at depths exceeding 600 m. Despite its greater depth of use, the inter-panel barrier gate design has been associated with about one-third as much face region burst activity as the double-use yield pillar design.