Short communication: antibiotic residues in milk following the use of intravaginal sponges for estrus synchronization in dairy ewes

The addition of antibiotics to intravaginal sponges used to synchronize ewe estrus is currently a recommended practice for the prevention of posttreatment vaginal infections. Application of this antibiotic treatment is usually done without withdrawal periods for milk, but official pharmaceutical instructions do not consider the extra-label use of antibiotics, which could result in the presence of antibiotic residues in milk. To understand the effects of the use of antibiotics on the performance of these hormonal treatments, milk collected from a group of Manchega ewes estrus synchronized by intravaginally inserted progestagen sponges jointly impregnated with antibiotics (benzyl penicillin procaine: 1,000,000 IU/25 sponges plus DH-streptomycin: 1 g/25 sponges) was evaluated for antibiotic residue persistence with 5 types of antibiotic screening tests (BRT, Copan CMT, Delvotest MSC, Eclipse 100, and New SNAP Beta-Lactams). Time to antibiotic residue depletion was established by a logistic regression model, and a significant response to milking order was observed in all methods. Positive or doubtful tests were observed after the insertion of intravaginal sponges for all assay screening tests at the time of the first milking and sometimes afterwards.     

Endocrine alterations associated with extended time interval between estrus and ovulation in high-yield dairy cows

Short fertile half-lives of the male and female gametes in the female tract necessitate accurate timing of artificial insemination. We examined the possible association between extension of the estrus to ovulation (E-O) interval and alterations in concentrations of estradiol, progesterone, and the preovulatory LH surge before estrus and ovulation. High-yielding Holstein cows (n = 74 from a total of 106) were synchronized and were examined around the time of the subsequent estrus. They were observed continuously for estrual behavior. Blood samples were collected before and after estrus, and ultrasound checks for ovulation were made every 4 h. About three-quarters of the cows exhibited short (but normal) E-O intervals of 22 to 25 h (25%) or normal intervals of 25 to 30 h (47%); 17% of them displayed a long (but normal) E-O interval of 31 to 35 h, and about 10% exhibited a very long E-O interval of 35 to 50 h. Extended E-O interval comprised estrus-to-LH surge and LH surge-to-ovulation intervals that were both longer than normal. Pronounced changes in hormonal concentrations were noted before ovulation in the very long E-O interval group of cows: progesterone and estradiol concentrations were reduced, and the preovulatory LH peak surge was markedly less than in the other 3 groups. Postovulation progesterone concentrations during the midluteal phase were lesser in the very long and the long E-O interval groups compared with those in the short and normal interval groups. Season, parity, milk yield, and body condition did not affect the estrus to LH surge, LH surge to ovulation, and E-O intervals. The results indicate an association between preovulatory-reduced estradiol concentrations and a small preovulatory LH surge, on the one hand, and an extended E-O interval, on the other hand. Delayed ovulation could cause nonoptimal timing of AI, a less than normal preovulatory LH surge that may be associated with suboptimal maturation of the oocyte before ovulation, or reduced progesterone concentrations before and after ovulation. All may be factors associated with poor fertility in cows with a very long E-O interval.     

Short communication: Conception rates following detection of estrus and timed AI in dairy cows synchronized using GnRH and PGF2alpha

The objective of this study was to compare conception rates of cows exhibiting spontaneous estrus and receiving artificial insemination (AI) before completion of a timed AI protocol with cows that did not display estrus spontaneously, but were inseminated after 1 of 3 GnRH-PGF_2α protocols. Cows (n = 432) in 2 herds were administered GnRH on d -7 and were tail-chalked daily. Cows detected in estrus before d 0 were inseminated immediately. Cows not detected in estrus by d 0 were administered PGF_2α and were tail-chalked daily until 48 h after PGF_2α. Cows detected in estrus from d −7 to 48 h after PGF_2α were inseminated and designated as treatment A (n = 46). Cows not detected in estrus and not inseminated by 48 h after PGF_2α were assigned randomly to receive either GnRH 48 h after PGF_2α and timed AI 16 h later (treatment B; n = 132), or GnRH and timed AI 64 h after PGF_2α (treatment C; n = 127), or timed AI 64 h after PGF_2α (treatment D; n = 127). Pregnancy was diagnosed 38 to 45 d after AI by palpation per rectum of uterine contents. Nearly 11% of all cattle exhibited spontaneous estrus and received immediate AI. Herd did not influence the percentage of cows detected in estrus and inseminated. Conception rates did not differ among treatments. Conception rates differed between herds, but no interaction of herd × treatment was detected. No differences were detected between herds for days in milk, milk production, AI service number, or parity.     

Evaluation and characterization of estrus alerts and behavioral parameters generated by an ear-attached accelerometer-based system for automated detection of estrus

Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of an ear-attached automated estrus detection (AED) system (Smartbow; Zoetis) that monitored physical activity and rumination time, and to characterize AED system estrus alert features (i.e., timing and duration). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 216) commenced a protocol for the synchronization of estrus at 50 ± 3 DIM or 18 ± 3 d after artificial insemination. For 7 d after induction of luteolysis with PGF_2α (d 0), we used visual observation of estrous behavior (30 min, 2 times per day) and data from an automated mounting behavior monitoring system based on a pressure-activated tail-head sensor (HeatWatch; Cowchips LLC) as a reference test (RTE) to detect behavioral estrus. Concomitantly, estrus alerts and their features were collected from the AED system. Progesterone levels confirmed luteal regression, and transrectal ultrasonography confirmed the occurrence and timing of ovulation. Performance metrics for the AED system were estimated with PROC FREQ in SAS, using the RTE or ovulation only as a reference. Performance was also estimated after the removal of cows with a discrepancy between the RTE and ovulation. Continuous outcomes with or without repeated measurements were evaluated by ANOVA using PROC MIXED in SAS. Based on the RTE, 86.6% (n = 187) of the cows presented estrus and ovulated; 1.4% (n = 3) presented estrus and did not ovulate; 6.4% (n = 14) did not present estrus but ovulated; and 5.6% (n = 12) did not present estrus or ovulation. We found no difference in the proportion of cows detected in estrus and with ovulation for the AED system (83.4%) and the RTE (86.6%). Compared with estrus events as detected by the RTE, sensitivity for the AED was 91.6% (95% CI: 87.6–95.5) and specificity was 69.2% (95% CI: 51.5–87.0). Using ovulation as reference, sensitivity was 89.6% (95% CI: 85.3–93.8) and specificity was 86.7% (95% CI 69.5–100). For all cows with agreement between the RTE and ovulation, sensitivity was 92.5% (95% CI: 88.7–96.3) and specificity was 91.7% (95% CI: 76.0–100). The mean (±SD) interval from induction of luteolysis to estrus alerts, estrus alert duration, and the onset of estrus alerts to ovulation interval were 72.2 ± 18.1, 13.5 ± 3.8, and 23.8 ± 7.1 h, respectively. We concluded that an ear-attached AED system that monitored physical activity and rumination time was effective at detecting cows in estrus and generated few false positive alerts when accounting for ovulation, cow physiological limitations, and the limitations of the RTE.     

Inseminations at estrus induced by presynchronization before application of synchronized estrus and ovulation

A controlled field study examined conception rates after 2 timed artificial insemination (TAI) breeding protocols conducted on 2 commercial dairy farms. Estrous cycles in postpartum lactating cows were presynchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) given 14 d apart (Pre-synch) and then, after 12 d, the standard Ovsynch protocol (injection of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after an injection of PGF(2alpha), with one TAI at 12 to 16 h after the second GnRH injection) or Heatsynch protocol [injection of GnRH 7 d before an injection of PGF(2alpha), followed 24 h later by 1 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) and one TAI 48 h after ECP] was applied. Experimental design allowed artificial insemination to occur anytime after the second Presynch injection and during the designed breeding week when estrus was detected. Of the 1846 first services performed, only 1503 (rate of compliance = 81.4%) were performed according to protocol. Numbers of cows inseminated, logistic-regression adjusted conception rates, and days in milk (DIM) were for inseminations made: 1) during 14 d after first Presynch injection (n = 145; 22.6%; 54 +/- 0.4 DIM); 2) during 12 d after second Presynch injection (n = 727; 33%; 59 +/- 0.2 DIM); 3) during 7 d after the first GnRH injection of Ovsynch or Heatsynch (n = 96; 32.1%; 74 +/- 0.5 DIM); 4) after estrus as part of Heatsynch (n = 212; 44.6%; 76 +/- 0.3 DIM); 4) after TAI as part of Heatsynch (n = 154; 21.1%; 76 +/- 0.4 DIM); 5) after estrus as part of Ovsynch (n = 43; 48.7%; 77 +/- 0.7 DIM); and 6) after TAI as part of Ovsynch (n = 271; 24.4%; 77 +/- 0.3 DIM). Conception rates when AI occurred after one Presynch injection were less than when AI occurred after 2 Presynch injections. Conception rates for those inseminated after either Presynch injection did not differ from those inseminated after combined Heatsynch + Ovsynch. Cows in the Ovsynch and Heatsynch protocols inseminated after estrus during the breeding week had greater conception rates than those receiving the TAI, but overall conception rates did not differ between protocols. Among cows inseminated after detected estrus, conception was greater for cows in the Heatsynch + Ovsynch protocol (77 +/- 0.4 DIM) than for those inseminated after either Presynch injection (54 +/- 0.4 or 59 +/- 0.2 DIM). We concluded that conception rates after Heatsynch and Ovsynch were similar under these experimental conditions, and that delaying first AI improved fertility for cows inseminated after detected estrus.     

Presynchronization with prostaglandin F2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone simultaneously improved first-service pregnancy per artificial insemination in lactating Holstein cows compared with Presynch-14 when combined with detection of estrus

This study aimed to determine the effect of 2 simple breeding strategies combining artificial insemination (AI) after detection of estrus (AIED) and timed AI (TAI) on first-service fertility in lactating Holstein cows. Weekly, lactating Holstein cows (n = l,049) between 40 and 46 d in milk (DIM) were randomly assigned to initiate 1 of 2 breeding strategies for first service: Presynch-14 and PG+G. Presynch-14 is a presynchronization strategy with 2 PGF_2α treatments 14 d apart with the last PGF_2α 14 d before the initiation of the Ovsynch protocol. Cows treated with PG+G receive a simpler presynchronization program that uses PGF_2α and GnRH simultaneously 7 d before Ovsynch. In both treatments, cows detected in standing estrus by tail chalk at any time ≥55 DIM were inseminated, and treatment was discontinued (n = 525). Cows completing treatment received TAI from 78 to 84 DIM (n = 526). In a subgroup of cows that received TAI, blood was collected (n = 163) to assess circulating concentrations of progesterone, and ultrasonographic evaluations of ovaries were performed on the day of first GnRH of Ovsynch (n = 162) and PGF_2α of Ovsynch (n = 122). The proportion of cows that received TAI was greater for PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (63.5 vs. 31.9%), which increased DIM at first service for cows treated with PG+G compared with Presynch-14 (75.5 ± 0.4 vs. 68.7 ± 0.4). For cows receiving TAI, the ovulatory response to first GnRH of Ovsynch (73.8 vs. 48.8%) and the proportion of cows with functional corpora lutea (92.6 vs. 73.1%) were greater for PG+G than Presynch-14. Cows treated with PG+G had greater overall pregnancy per AI (P/AI) 42 ± 7 d after AI (40.2 vs. 33.6%) and calving per AI (32.1 vs. 25.2%) than Presynch-14. For cows receiving AIED, treatment did not affect P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI. However, for cows receiving TAI, PG+G increased P/AI compared with Presynch-14 (44.6 vs. 35.2%). Overall, cows receiving TAI had greater P/AI 42 ± 7 d after AI (42.5 vs. 31.5%) and calving per AI (34.1 vs. 23.7%) and decreased pregnancy loss (16.8 vs. 25.2%) than cows receiving AIED. In summary, PG+G increased the proportion of cows receiving TAI and the DIM at first service, P/AI, and calving per AI compared with Presynch-14 when both TAI programs were combined with AIED.