应对长江口咸潮入侵的临界流量经验模型研究

1994年以来,长江口咸潮入侵严重威胁当地供水安全,随着长江上游水库群陆续建成,有关部门提出了通过上游水库群压咸调度保障长江口地区供水安全的方案。为明确压咸调度的目标流量(即临界流量),基于统计分析的方法,采用多元回归分析和主成分分析方法,选取实测站点数据建立了盐度-潮差-入海流量的相关关系统计模型,研究了咸潮发生的机理;通过模型分析多次咸潮入侵数据,确定临界流量为一个变化值,潮差290～335 cm下的临界流量在9 390～21 633 m³/s之间。研究表明,当长江口咸潮入侵时,单独依靠长江上游水库调度压咸所需的流量大,响应时间长,压咸效果不明显。因此,实际压咸调度应通过流域整体调度与本地蓄淡避咸水库共同作用应对咸潮入侵。     

我国流域立法的困境分析及对策研究

水资源的时空整体性决定了对水资源的管理必须以流域为单元。学术界和各国政府对流域管理的共识以及当前我国水资源所面临的严峻形势,客观上要求我国必须加强流域管理立法。流域管理立法是改善流域水环境的重要途径,其具有深刻的理论基础和实践基础。鉴于我国流域立法存在管理体制受限、立法层次约束和立法体系不完善等现实问题,实现真正的流域管理需要理顺管理体制、提高立法层次和完善立法体系。     

桥梁对河流阻水影响的一个综合判别指标

针对桥梁对河流的阻水影响问题,基于河流能量观点提出了考虑河流能量与桥梁阻水比双因素的综合判别指标η,应用其讨论了山区河流和平原区河流修建桥梁对河流的阻水影响。结果表明:综合判别指标η可以有效地区分相同桥墩布置形式桥梁对不同类型河流的阻水影响;综合判别指标η可以指导桥墩在河流中的合理布置,有效减小桥梁对河流的阻水影响,与桥梁阻水比、单宽流量等指标在指导桥墩合理布置方面起到相同效果。该研究成果在一定程度上弥补了一般桥梁阻水比指标的不足。     

关于改进我国水资源区分类体系的探讨——基于水资源管理范围演进的视角

分析了人类开发利用和管理水资源的历史演进,总结得出人类开发利用水资源的范围经历了"点→干流线段→干流线→河系网→流域面→立体(地表水、地下水、雨水和空中水并用)"的历史演进,水资源管理活动对此也进行了响应。环境科学、特别是生态学的研究成果推动了流域和流域水资源管理的发展,催生了不同发展阶段的流域水资源管理模式。总结了流域理论的发展历程,介绍了流域水资源管理的6种基本模式,并指出一体化水资源管理及一体化流域管理已经成为目前治水的主流思维。基于我国需要实行流域管理和行政区域管理相结合、统一管理和分级管理相结合的管理体制这一主张,针对最严格水资源管理制度在实施中的困难,提出了构建动态的多尺度水资源区分类体系的框架性建议。     

山区河流浅水条件下漂石对河床响应与泥沙补给影响的试验研究

受暴雨洪水与滑坡、泥石流灾害的影响,山区河流床沙多为宽级配卵砾石泥沙,甚至出现较多的漂石,从而影响近底水流结构与推移质输移特性。基于野外漂石河流的调查,通过概化试验,探讨了漂石颗粒对河床冲淤的影响;对比分析了不同水沙条件下漂石对推移质输沙率过程的影响;根据床面粗化程度与漂石状态相异的两种类型对比试验,探讨了漂石对不同水沙条件下推移质输沙率的影响程度。初步表明：随着漂石颗粒相对暴露度（D/h,漂石等效粒径与平均水深之比）的减少,漂石对其尾部区域水流的混掺越加突出,从而对河床的冲刷能力变大;根据本试验采用的水沙参数,漂石对推移质输沙率的扩大效应为几倍至十几倍。     

时间尺度对平原感潮河网水动力水质模拟精度的影响

为探究不同时间尺度边界入流条件对平原感潮河网水动力水质模型模拟精度的影响,以典型平原感潮河网地区的张家港市中部为研究区域,结合野外同步监测数据、自动高频监测数据、常规监测资料等构建了水动力水质模型进行模拟分析。结果表明:时间尺度、开始取值时刻以及调度情况均会影响模拟精度;研究区域边界入流条件、水动力模拟结果和水质模拟结果可信的最大时间尺度为1 h,水质模拟精度优于水动力模拟精度。     

奎屯河流域健康评价

以新疆典型的干旱内陆河流域--奎屯河流域为研究对象,在确定流域健康评价时空尺度的基础上,提出涵盖流域水资源健康、涉水生态环境健康、社会经济健康的评价指标体系,构建基于组合赋权与协调发展度的流域健康评价模型。结果表明:现状年(2015年)处于亚健康状态的分区有:子区1、子区2、子区3、子区6,综合评价指数分别为:0.419、0.404、0.408、0.401,协调发展类型为临界协调发展;处于不健康状态的分区有:子区4和子区5,综合评价指数为0.358和0.343,协调发展类型属于中度不协调衰退型。     

甬江感潮河流上下游码头群对河道行洪的联合影响

为分析甬江上下游码头群对河道行洪的联合影响,基于Delft3D数学模型开展了典型潮洪条件下甬江上下游不同码头群对河道水流特性的影响研究,结果表明:单段码头群位置距河口越远,或码头分布越密集,引起的水位壅高程度越大;在不同码头群共同产生壅水影响的区域,全河段码头群引起的河道洪水位变化比各码头群单独影响时增大,在不同码头群产生水位壅高和降低影响的河段,全河段码头群作用下水位影响部分相抵,但由于降低幅度小于壅高幅度,河道洪水位变化仍呈增大状态;码头群工程局部流速减少区域和外侧河道流速增加区域均呈带状分布,全河段码头群联合作用加剧了单段码头群引起的河道流速的变化且流速减小程度较流速增加程度大。     

Biomic river restoration: A new focus for river management

River management based solely on physical science has proven to be unsustainable and unsuccessful, evidenced by the fact that the problems this approach intended to solve (e.g., flood hazards, water scarcity, and channel instability) have not been solved and long‐term deterioration in river environments has reduced the capacity of rivers to continue meeting the needs of society. In response, there has been a paradigm shift in management over the past few decades, towards river restoration. But the ecological, morphological, and societal benefits of river restoration have, on the whole, been disappointing. We believe that this stems from the fact that restoration overrelies on the same physical analyses and approaches, with flowing water still regarded as the universally predominant driver of channel form and structural intervention seen as essential to influencing fluvial processes. We argue that if river restoration is to reverse long‐standing declines in river functions, it is necessary to recognize the influence of biology on river forms and processes and re‐envisage what it means to restore a river. This entails shifting the focus of river restoration from designing and constructing stable channels that mimic natural forms to reconnecting streams within balanced and healthy biomes, and so levering the power of biology to influence river processes. We define this new approach as biomic river restoration.     

Influence of habitat heterogeneity and bed surface complexity on benthic invertebrate diversity in a gravel‐bed river

Maintaining or restoring physical habitat diversity is a central tenet of sustainable river management, yet a link between habitat and ecological diversity in fluvial systems has long remained equivocal. The lack of consistent evidence partly reflects the problems of characterizing habitat in ways that are ecologically meaningful. This paper assesses the influence of habitat heterogeneity and complexity on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a mountain gravel‐bed river. With the use of 0.1‐m resolution data obtained from an acoustic Doppler current profiler, heterogeneity and complexity in hydraulic conditions and bed topography were characterized using 13 metrics applied to 30 areas, each 1 m², with an invertebrate sample collected from each area. Turnover of invertebrate taxa (i.e., β‐diversity) between sampled areas was rather limited, but observed differences in diversity were related significantly to several metrics of habitat heterogeneity. Invertebrate abundance was related to habitat diversity, patch size coefficient of variation, and patch size, whereas the Shannon diversity was related to the number of patches and patch size. None of the habitat complexity metrics accounted for a significant amount of observed variation in invertebrate communities between sampled areas. The paper demonstrates that high‐resolution data can help reveal relationships between habitat and benthic invertebrate diversity.