1998年昌江流域暴雨洪水分析

1998年昌江发生了建国以来最大洪水，文章从天气环流背景、降雨特征等方面分析这次洪水形成的特点和发展过程。     

江口水电站设计洪水分析研究

在分析芙蓉江流暴雨的洪水特性的基础上，采用多种方法插补展延了洪水资源系列，并充分利用历史洪水调查资料，使设计洪水分析计算采用的资料具有一定的代表性，可靠性，其中坝堤百年一遇设计洪水洪峰流量为12000m^3/s,72h洪量为10.2亿m^3，对江口水电站设计洪水成果，通过与上下游，干支流各站的设计洪水参数及与长江流域的部分大中型水利水电工程设计水成果比较，进行了合理性分析。     

土工合成材料在防汛抢险中的应用

土工合成材料具有整体性强、抢险速度快、适应性强、储运方便、造价低、经久耐用和可废物利用的优点，在防汛抢险中主要起到排水、反滤和防渗的作用，常用于堤岸崩塌、基础管涌、堤身跌窝与漏洞、背水坡散浸、背水面脱坡、洪水浸顶和防风浪淘刷、涵闸及堵口等方面，可及时排队险情。     

小浪底水库运用初期非汛期调度方式的分析

应用水量调度决策支持系统 ,研究了小浪底水库考虑多个兴利目标的非汛期优化运用方案 ,对运用方案分析提出了水库优化运用区间 ,采用数理统计方法探讨了水库非汛期的线性调度函数 ,取得了初步成果可供水量调度部门参考使用     

关于长江重大问题的思考

长江流域横跨我国华东、华中、西南三大经济区,地理位置优越,水资源得天独厚,是我国最重要的经济区域之一。新中国成立后,党和政府高度重视长江治理开发工作,组建了流域机构,开展了流域综合利用规划,初步建立了长江防洪、灌溉、水力发电、航运、水土保持和水资源保护体系,在保护     

西津电站对南宁及贵港防洪的作用

江河中的闸坝、电站等水利工程的调度运行对其上下游城市防洪有着重要的作用。郁江上的西津电站在洪水期如何调度可减轻上游南宁及下游贵港的洪水压力?通过分析"2001 7"洪水的调度,论述调度过程的作用和效果,为以后的防洪调度提供决策参考。     

流量自动控制的设计与实现

文章通过分析多相流模拟井的实际工作要求 ,提出了简单实用的流量自动控制模型。应用成型的计算机数据采集和控制模块及稳定可靠的流量控制部件 ,实现了各相流量的自动控制过程。该流量自动控制系统调节精度高、速度快、整体造价低 ,在实际应用中取得了良好的效果。     

Asymmetric Regulation System Fit for Chinese Telecom Market

After the new round of restructuring of Chinese telecom sector,it's pressing to formulate and implement asymmetric regulation policies so as to shape an effectively competitive market structure in a relatively short term.This paper reviewed the asymmetric regulation policies and practices carried out in foreign telecom market,and then according to the specific situations of Chinese telecom market,proposed the principles and corresponding policies for establishing an asymmetric regulation system fit for Chin...     

The role of benchmarking for yardstick competition

With the increasing interest in yardstick regulation, there is a need to understand the most appropriate method for realigning tariffs at the outset. Benchmarking is the tool used for such realignment and is therefore a necessary first-step in the implementation of yardstick competition. A number of concerns have been raised about the application of benchmarking, making some practitioners reluctant to move towards yardstick based regimes. We assess five of the key concerns often discussed and find that, in general, these are not as great as perceived. The assessment is based on economic principles and experiences with applying benchmarking to regulated sectors, e.g. in the electricity and water industries in the UK, The Netherlands, Austria and Germany in recent years. The aim is to demonstrate that clarity on the role of benchmarking reduces the concern about its application in different regulatory regimes. We find that benchmarking can be used in regulatory settlements, although the range of possible benchmarking approaches that are appropriate will be small for any individual regulatory question. Benchmarking is feasible as total cost measures and environmental factors are better defined in practice than is commonly appreciated and collusion is unlikely to occur in environments with more than 2 or 3 firms (where shareholders have a role in monitoring and rewarding performance). Furthermore, any concern about companies under-recovering costs is a matter to be determined through the regulatory settlement and does not affect the case for using benchmarking as part of that settlement.