Comparison of calibration curve fitting methods in the determination of H2S mass fractions in natural gas by GC-SCD

This paper discusses metrologically the best practice regarding the calibration curves applied to H₂S mass fractions determination in natural gas by gas chromatography with sulfur chemiluminescence detection (GC-SCD). Three calibration curves were constructed by performing GC-SCD analysis of different H₂S gas standard concentrations (from 3 mg kg^?1 up to 500 mg kg^?1). These experimental curves are better fitted by an unweighted quadratic calibration curve considering ANOVA approach compared to ASTM D5504-12. Despite this, the obtained results show that these two different calibration curve approaches (ASTM and ANOVA) lead to comparable results. Hence, there are no significant statistical differences between these two approaches based on the hypothesis test applied. However, the quadratic calibration curve presents measurement uncertainties of H₂S mass fractions much lower than the ASTM approach.     

焊接热循环对ASTM4130钢热影响区组织及韧性影响

采用金相、扫描电镜(SEM)和焊接热模拟方法,研究了不同峰值温度和焊接线能量对ASTM4130钢焊接热影响区(HAZ)显微组织、冲击韧性和断口形貌的影响.结果表明,ASTM4130钢热影响区除回火软化区外均发生脆化现象.当峰值温度为1200 ℃和1350℃时,由于晶粒粗大,且产生了贝氏体、未回火马氏体和M-A组元等非平衡组织,其冲击韧性损失达母材的94.5%,脆化现象最严重.当峰值温度为950℃,冲击韧性较低的原因是该区产生了未回火马氏体和块状铁素体.当峰值温度为800℃时,晶界附近碳化物聚集和不均匀分布,以及块状铁素体的存在,造成该区发生脆化.焊态下焊接线能量对ASTM4130钢粗晶区的冲击韧性影响较小.     

一种精确测量ASTM标准圆形拉伸试样锥度的方法

介绍了ASTM标准中圆形拉伸试样主要部位的尺寸与要求。采用国产万能工具显微镜-投影法对试样在平行长度部位的锥度进行了测量。该方法简便易行,结果准确可靠,满足了标准要求,同时发挥了老设备的作用,保证了试样的加工精度。     

ASTM SMO254板式换热器腐蚀的原因

某炼厂常压塔顶全焊接板式换热器(材质ASTM SMO254),在使用约半年时间即出现大面积腐蚀穿孔。从现场情况看,换热器常顶油气侧入口焊接面结垢严重,出现大面积铵盐沉积,清洗后发现,垢下发生严重腐蚀,甚至穿孔。本工作从工艺防腐蚀和换热器内部结构等方面对腐蚀原因进行了分析。结果表明:由于注水量的不足,导致铵盐在换热板表面结垢,同时"一脱三注"的不稳定,导致了严重的垢下腐蚀。     

Evaluation of Petroleum Impurities in Motor Spirit and Diesel Oils Using Artificial Neural Network

Studies have been conducted for the ternary mixture of motor spirit, diesel, and kerosene oil samples using artificial neural network (ANN). American standard for testing materials (ASTM) distillation data of samples were used for the evaluation of respective components. Results of such evaluation of the samples were found to comply well with experimental values.     

How surface damage removal affects fatigue life

The effect of the removal of work hardened surface layers from specimens of 2024-T4 aluminum alloy and AISI-4130 steel on their fatigue lives has been investigated. Specimens were fatigued at selected stress levels for a given number of cycles and the surface layer was removed followed by subsequent fatigue cycling. Results confirm that when a material is subjected to fatigue loading, damage accumulates in the surface layers in the form of work hardening. Removal of the surface layer brings the specimen back to its pre-fatigued condition.     

浅论氯离子渗透试验方法

本文对目前最常用的三种混凝土氯离子渗透试验方法ASTMC1202、NEL法和RCM法进行讨论,并分析了各自的优缺点。     

常压下石油馏分蒸馏曲线换算的数学模型

对常压下石油馏分的实沸点蒸馏曲线与平衡汽化曲线以及恩氏蒸馏曲线与平衡汽化曲线的换算图表进行了回归,同时总结了文献中已有的常压下各蒸馏曲线的换算模型,从而建立了一套完整的常压蒸馏曲线换算模型,该模型可用于双向计算。误差分析表明该模型具有可靠的计算精度。选取实测数据对该模型进行验证,结果表明新模型的计算值与实测数据吻合较好,计算准确性优于文献模型。     

电站阀门用ASTM材料压力，温度等级的应用与分析

介绍了电站阀门用ASTM材料的压力温度等级的计算方法及常用高温高压电站阀门压力温度等级与磅级制阀门的关系     

Comparison of methods to determine CTOD for SENB specimens in different strain hardening steels

Methods for determining crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) given in national and international standards are compared for steels with a range of strain hardening characteristics. Crack tip opening displacement measurements were made from single‐edge notched bend notches using a silicone rubber casting method. The finite element model produced good agreements with predictions of these CTOD measurements. The versatility of the finite element model enabled CTOD from the original crack tip and the 45° intercept method to be compared. The 45° CTOD generally underestimates the original crack tip CTOD, and is less useful for conditions with stable crack extension. Apart from the high strain hardening material, CTOD calculated using BS 7448‐1, WES 1108 (JWES), and ASTM E1820 was slightly lower than the values determined from silicone measurements and modelling, which is conservative. ASTM E1820 gave the largest underestimation of CTOD, whilst BS 7448‐1 may be unsuitable for higher strain hardening steels, where the standard predicts higher CTOD than measured from the replica. JWES gives the most consistent estimation of CTOD for steels with a wide range of strain hardening values.