流动注射分析法对复合肥中五氧化二磷的分析

在复合肥的生产过程中，用流动注射分析测定磷矿，磷石膏，磷酸中的五氧化二磷，该方法制样简单，分析速度快，结果准确。     

R_2O—BaO—P_2O_5磷酸盐玻璃形成特点和基本性质的研究

磷酸盐玻璃的性质和形成规律的研究比硅酸盐玻璃少得多。由于磷酸盐玻璃的化学稳定性比普通硅酸盐玻璃差,原料价格高等因素,降低了它的实用性。但是磷酸盐玻璃具有某些特殊性能是其他系统玻璃不能达到的,若对特定的磷酸盐系统作适当成分调整后,仍可以获得基本性质较好,有实际应用价值的特种光功能玻璃,如激光介质材料和特种光学     

ZnO-P2O5-H2O反应体系磷酸锌颜料的防锈活性研究

采用X—ray、FT—IR、TEM硬化学分析等手段测定了ZnO—P2O5-H2O反应体系制备的磷酸锌防锈颜料的组成、结晶水、粒度分布、颗粒形貌、溶解性、润湿角、比表面积，及其在醇酸树脂中的分散性，研究其化学物理性质。结果表明：该法生产的磷酸锌含有16％未反应的氧化锌，颗粒粗大呈砖形，大部分分布在15～45μm之间；其比表面积较小，在水中溶解度小，离解程度低，在中性介质中表现为一种惰性颜料；磷酸锌在水和有机溶剂中均可润湿，但很快发生沉淀，分散性欠理想。     

壳聚糖/磷钙杂化膜的制备与性能研究

将壳聚糖/钙盐复合膜浸泡在磷酸二氢钾溶液中制备了壳聚糖/磷钙杂化膜.用电子扫描电镜观察杂化膜和膜内磷钙微粒的形貌,研究了杂化膜的力学性能、溶胀率、吸光度及热稳定性.结果表明,杂化膜内磷钙晶体为柱状和层状结构,磷钙被包裹在杂化膜内,并与壳聚糖膜形成紧密的连续结构.随着膜中磷钙的质量分数从2.1%增加到8.0%,膜的溶胀率从102%增加到144%,其在200～800 nm波长范围的吸光度也逐渐增加.当磷钙的质量分数为7.0%时,杂化膜的力学性能最佳,其拉伸强度为54.42 MPa、弹性模量为4045.72 MPa、断裂伸长率为4.85%.杂化膜的热分解温度为299℃,高于壳聚糖膜的分解温度290℃.这种具有层状磷钙结构的杂化膜具有良好的生物相容性,可作为一种潜在的支架材料.     

不同品种磷肥在土壤中的退化研究

对钙镁磷肥（FMP）、过磷酸钙（SSP）和部分酸化磷肥（PAPR）在河南郑州西岗沙土和河南西华县潮土中的退化情况进行了研究。     

类球形低硫磷酸铁的制备技术研究

磷酸铁（FePO₄）是锂电池正极材料磷酸铁锂（LiFePO₄）的核心前驱体,FePO₄形貌及硫含量对合成的LiFePO₄材料性能有重要影响。为得到类球形低硫FePO₄产品,在传统液相沉淀法技术基础上做了改进优化,添加十六烷基三甲基溴化铵（CTAB）作为形貌助剂提高产品球形度,添加氨水作为配体形成磷酸铁铵配合物改善结晶过程,降低产品硫含量。结果表明：所制备的FePO₄产品硫质量分数低,达到2.6×10 ^-5,形貌为均一的微米类球形颗粒,D₅₀=11.4 μm,振实密度达到1.22 g/cm ³,有望成为制备高压实密度LiFePO₄材料的核心前驱体。     

磷酸锌生产工艺研探

用Ｒ溶剂溶解低品位氧化锌，间接法生产磷酸锌，改变了传统的直接法生产工艺，降低了生产成本，产品质量达到国际标准的锌含量。     

复分解法制备磷酸二氢钾的研究

介绍了以工业氯化钾和工业磷酸为基本原料，采用复分解法，在氯化钾过量的情况下，加入氨水作为pH值调节剂，制备磷酸二氢钾（KH2PO4）的研究。产品含量大于92％，原料转化率（以磷酸计）大于85％，无三废产生。     

化学强化生物除磷工艺及设计

本文介绍了一种新的化学强化生物除磷工艺及其设计实例，与Phostrip侧流除磷工艺相比，其工艺优势在于所有污泥均经释磷和厌氧选择处理，通过化学沉积释放的磷，从而消除了在污泥处置过程中产生的磷释放回到污水处理系统的问题；所有回流污泥经厌氧选择处理，含有较高浓度聚磷菌类微生物，从而具有较高的除磷效率。     

Reactive rock phosphate fertilizers and soil testing for phosphorus: The effect of particle size of the rock phosphate

North Carolina rock phosphate (NCRP) (highly carbonate—substituted apatite) was ground to produce three samples with different particle size distributions. The effectiveness of these fertilizers was compared with the effectiveness of superphosphate in a field experiment and three glasshouse experiments using lateritic soils from south-western Australia. Non-reactive Queensland rock phosphate (low carbonate-substituted apatite from the Duchess deposit) was also used in the pot experiments. Bicarbonate-soluble phosphorus extracted from the soil is widely used in Western Australia to predict plant yields from previously-applied fertilizer dressings. For both field and pot experiments bicarbonate-extractable phosphorus (soil test value) was measured and related to subsequent plant yields.As calculated from the initial slope of the relationship between yield and the level of P applied, finely powdered NCRP was about 5–32% as effective as freshly-applied superphosphate in the year of application and also for two years after application in the field experiment, and for two successive crops in the three pot experiments. For both field and pot experiments, finely powdered NCRP, was at best, 1.5–2.0 times as effective as granular NCRP. Relative to freshly-applied superphosphate, the effectiveness of rock phosphates usually decreased with increasing level of application.For each of the crops in the field experiment, the relationships between yield and phosphorus content of plants (i.e. internal efficiency curves) were similar for all fertilizers. Thus the low effectiveness of the rock phosphates relative to superphosphate was solely due to much less phosphorus being taken up by plants. By contrast, in the pot experiments internal efficiency curves differed for different fertilizers. This is attributed to differences in the rate of phosphorus uptake by plant roots during the early stages of plant growth.For both field and pot experiments, soil test calibrations (the relationship between yield and soil test value) differed for rock phosphates and superphosphate. For superphosphate, soil test calibrations also differed for the three different years after the initial application of this fertilizer in the field experiment. For the second crop in the pot experiment, soil test calibrations differed for superphosphate applied at different times (before the first and the second crop). These results point out the difficulty of applying soil testing procedures to soils that have experienced different histories of fertilizer application.