Places that Support Human Flourishing: Lessons from Later Life

This review paper contends that by paying attention to the quality of life issues raised by older people, planners may promote better places for all. Recent research in the UK that asked older people to identify quality of life criteria revealed that health, income, social networks, community participation, information, activities, home, neighbourhood and mobility are key areas where old age can be enriched. The paper argues that of these, home, neighbourhood and mobility are paramount for four reasons. Firstly, older people are seen as situated, even fixed, in domestic environments; secondly, society has responded to later life by creating age-segregated spaces; thirdly, lessening mobility may increase the importance of the local arena and fourthly the interplay between the self and the environment underpins or undermines independence. The significance of place means that planners, even more than other professionals, need to be age aware. Drawing on recent national and international research this paper contemplates what a more age-friendly place might be like and considers how issues of age can interact with the broader planning agendas of sustainability, cohesion and liveability to create places that promote well-being for every member of the community.     

LINKING MICROBIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR FOODS WITH QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT

The current annual risk of acquiring a foodborne disease in the United States is estimated at 2.7 × 10^-2. The risk of associated death is estimated at 3.7 × 10^-5. These represent a health care burden >$3 billion. Using a risk assessment model one can identify levels of microbial contamination which may be unacceptable in foods and appropriate controls needed to reduce these levels. Salmonella bacteria continue to represent a large percentage of the identifiable infections. A model developed from human dose-response studies predicts the probability of infection for Salmonella at 7.5 × 10^-3 with exposure to a single CFU of the organism. Risks of severity (hospitalization), mortality, reactive arthritides, and mortality in the elderly are estimated at 3.1 × 10^-6, 7.5 × 10^-6, 1.7 × 10^-5, and 2.8 × 10^-4. Exposure to microbial contaminants needs to be evaluated on a single meal basis. For chicken, exposure may range from a single drum stick (38g) to a half broiler (176g) but averages around 80g. For beef between 51 and 85g may be consumed during a single meal. Therefore, methods for monitoring must be able to detect at least 1 CFU/80g. Risks for some pathogenic E. coli are estimated at 1,000 to 10,000 less than Salmonella. Therefore, use of coliforms as indicators needs to be assessed and related to occurrence and survival and regrowth potential of the enteric bacteria of greater public health concern. Because, 20% of the U.S. population may be considered to be in a special population category and at an increased risk of severe outcomes, no more than 20% failure of a standard should be acceptable .     

PURIFICATION AND PARTIAL CHARACTERIZATION OF TWO α-AMYLASE INHIBITORS FROM BLACK BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris)1

Two α-amylase inhibitors from black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) were purified to homogencity using ammonium sulfate fractionation, DEAE-Sephadex chromatography, phenyl-Sepharose hydrophobic interaction chromatography and gel filtration with Sephadex G-100. The inhibitors were designated I–1 and I–2 based on their order of elution from the phenyl-Sepharose column. Both inhibitors are mannose containing glycoproteins, composed of subunits; active against porcine pancreatic, human salivary, and insect α-amylases and inactive against bacterial, mold, and plant α-amylases. The inhibitors I-1 and I–2 have molecular weights of 49,000 and 47,000 and isoelectric points 4.93 and 4.86, respectively. Both inhibitors have similar amino acid compositions and are rich in aspartic acid, serine, glutamic acid, valine, and threonine and are low in sulfur containing amino acids. I–2 is more resistant to heat denaturation than I-1.     

Agar-Gel Immunodiffusion Test for Rapid Identification of Pollock Surimi in Raw Meat Products

A test for the rapid identification of raw pollock surimi (TRIPS) was developed. This was an adaptation of previously developed field screening agar-gel immunodiffusion tests for speciation of meat products. It was specific for Alaska pollock surimi at 2% concentration and other surimis at higher concentrations, showed detectable sensitivity to surimi in meat at 2–4%, and was 100% accurate in detection in laboratory trials.