排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1
1.
作为大涡模拟(LES)的唯一模型参数,经验 Smagorinsky 常数(CS)与特定的流动条件有关。为研究扁平箱梁气动特性 LES 的合理 CS取值,开展了 CS值在 0.032~0.7 范围以及动态亚格子黏性模型的多工况 LES 模拟,通过与风洞试验结果的对比,分析了主梁气动特性随 CS值的变化。研究认为:CS值不同时主梁表面压力和气动力的平均值差别不明显,其结果也与风洞试验吻合良好;但 CS值的变化对主梁表面压力和气动力的均方根(RMS)值影响明显,结果也与风洞试验存在较大差异,CS值增大导致气动力脉动降低甚至无脉动;LES 采用动态亚格子黏性模型无法给出主梁涡脱和表面压力的合理估计。在 0.064≤CS≤0.27 区间,LES 均能给出与风洞试验一致的主梁涡脱单频和 St值估计;从捕捉流动的非定常特性考虑,建议 CS在上述范围内取小值。研究认为,CS增大导致亚格子湍流黏性增大,流动的耗散作用增强,降低了 LES 对非定常湍流特性的捕捉能力,导致模拟的气动力脉动量减小。 相似文献
2.
In order to predict the local scour hole and its evaluation around a cylindrical bridge pier, the computational fluid dynamics
(CFD) and theories of sediment movement and transport were employed to carry out numerical simulations. In the numerical method,
the time-averaged Reynolds Navier-Stokes equations and the standard k-ɛ model were first used to simulate the three-dimensional flow field around a bridge pier fixed on river bed. The transient
shear stress on river bed was treated as a crucial hydrodynamic mechanism when handling sediment incipience and transport.
Then, river-bed volumetric sediment transport was calculated, followed by the modification of the river bed altitude and configuration.
Boundary adaptive mesh technique was employed to modify the grid system with changed river-bed boundary. The evolution of
local scour around a cylindrical bridge pier was presented. The numerical results represent the flow pattern and mechanism
during the pier scouring, with a good prediction of the maximum scour hole depth compared with test results. 相似文献
3.
4.
大跨索承桥梁抖振性能评估是桥梁抗风安全设计的重要环节。但当前抖振分析理论在揭示抖振基本物理成因时的“描述性”强于“解释性”,且风洞试验难以重现抖振过程中的流固耦合细节。对此,以苏通大桥标准主梁节段为研究对象,在Fluent软件中开展了模型抖振响应数值模拟,并将抖振响应数值解与理论解进行对比。结果表明,对高湍流度风场而言,模型风振以湍流引起的强迫振动为主,考虑流固耦合效应的抖振响应理论解与数值解的RMS较为接近,模型上、下方涡核发展交替进行,特征湍流对模型抖振响应的影响较小。 相似文献
1