Case hardening represents the most important heat treatment process to increase the load carrying capacity of gear components. Beside predominantly martensitic surface layers with low proportion of retained austenite, there were investigated material structures with differing properties in preceding research work.
In a previous publication, the results of three variants made of the material 20MnCr5, which is typically used for gears, were presented. The reference heat treatment was a conventional carburizing with subsequent case hardening. The second variant was also gas carburized, but with a high proportion of retained austenite. The last presented variant had a bainitic structure in the surface layer. The second and the third variant showed a similar tooth root bending strength compared to the reference. The numbers of the pitting resistance were significantly higher than for the reference variant.
This paper presents the results of further investigations on the influence of different microstructures on the gear load carrying capacity. For this purpose, gears made of 18CrNiMo7‑6 were tested with regard to their load carrying capacity. 18CrNiMo7‑6 is a case hardening steel like 20MnCr5, too, which is often applied in big gear components. The tooth root bending strength was approximately constant, whereas the pitting resistance decreased compared to the corresponding variants of the material 20MnCr5. In comparison to the carburized 20MnCr5 reference variant, only the 18CrNiMo7‑6 variant with a large proportion of retained austenite showed a higher pitting resistance.
The tooth root bending strength investigations took place in the cycle regime of limited life as well in the high cycle fatigue regime. The pitting resistance was only determined in the cycle regime of limited life.
相似文献Demands on modern gearboxes are constantly increasing, for example to comply with lightweight design goals or new CO2 thresholds. Normally, to increase performance requires making gearboxes and powertrains more robust. However, this increases the weight of a standard gearbox. The two trends therefore seem contradictory. To satisfy both of these goals, gears in gearboxes can be shot-peened to introduce high compressive residual stresses and improve their bending fatigue strength. To determine a gear’s tooth root bending fatigue strength, experiments are conducted up to a defined number of load cycles in the high cycle fatigue range. However, investigations of shot-peened gears have revealed tooth root fracture damage initiated at non-metallic inclusions in and above the very high cycle fatigue range. This means that a further reduction in bending load carrying capacity has to be expected at higher load cycles, something which is not covered under current standard testing conditions. The question is whether there is a significant decrease in the bending load carrying capacity and, also, if pulsating tests conducted at higher load cycles—or even tests on the FZG back-to-back test rig—are necessary to determine a proper endurance fatigue limit for shot-peened gears. This paper examines these questions.
相似文献