Formation of austenite in 1.5 pct Mn steels

The formation of austenite from different microstructural conditions has been studied in a series of 1.5 pct Mn steels that had been heated in and above the intercritical (α+ γ) region of the phase diagram. The influence of variables such as cementite morphology, initial structural state of the ferrite and the carbon content has been assessed in terms of their respective effects on the kinetics of austenite formation and final microstructure. Austenite was found to form preferentially on ferrite-ferrite grain boundaries for all initial structures. The results of this study have shown that the 1.5 pct Mn has lowered both the AC₃ and AC₁, lines causing large amounts of austenite to form in low carbon steel. The kinetics of austenite formation at 725 °C were not only very slow but also were approximately independent of the amount formed. Austenite appeared to form slightly more rapidly from cold rolled ferrite than from recrystallized ferrite or ferrite-pearlite structures.     

On the origin of equiaxed austenite grains that result from the hot rolling of steel

An investigation has been conducted into the influence of hot rolling on the microstructure of austenite in both a low alloy (transformable) and an austenitic stainless steel. Specimens of each steel were reheated and then given a single 50 pct reduction at various temperatures, after which the specimens were water quenched. The specimens were analyzed using optical, transmission electron and X-ray metallography. The results of these experiments showed that both steels exhibited equiaxed grains after high temperature rolling, elongated grains after low temperature rolling and a mixture of both types of grains after rolling at intermediate temperatures. One of the principal goals of this work was to study the origin of the equiaxed grains that result from high temperature rolling. Information obtained from dislocation observations and texture analysis has led to the conclusion that the mechanism most likely responsible for the equiaxed grains in as-rolled austenite is dynamic recrystallization. Formerly a Graduate Student, University of Pittsburgh     

Modern Microalloyed Steels

The addition of microalloying elements (MAE) to low C-Mn-Si HSLA steels has led to many benefits to the producers,fabricators and end-users.Microstructural improvements such as microstructural refinement,higher dislocation and sub-grain boundary densities and finer M-A-C distributions have led to higher strength,improved toughness and better formability.These improvements can often be traced to the MA addition.In steels for load-bearing applications,the combination of MAE with hardenability additions (Cr,Mo,B,etc.) and lower transformation temperatures has led to much higher strength levels than what were available a few years ago.The resulting nonpolygonal,bainitic and martensitic ferrite microstructures have not only higher strengths but also adequate levels of improved ductility and toughness.Hot strip,plate and pipe applications have benefitted from these developments.Similar improvements have been found in the microalloyed forging steels,where the change from pearlite-ferrite to bainitic ferrite microstructures has led to higher strengths and improved high-cycle fatigue resistance,with little penalty in ductility and toughness.In the cold rolled gauges,both the so-called Advanced High Strength Steels (DP,TRIP and Complex Phase Steels) and the martensitic direct-quenched and press-quenched steels,along with the Interstitial-Free steels,have benefited from MAE additions,especially in the very popular zinc-coated sheet form.This paper will briefly review each of these topic areas,and the underlying physical metallurgy will be discussed.