Attributions and relapse in opiate addicts.

Investigated whether attributions of opiate addicts would predict both their ability to abstain from future use and their reactions to abstinence violations. Measures of generalized beliefs about responsibility for positive and negative outcomes and specific attributions about relapse episodes were elicited from 80 addicts at the time of admission for inpatient detoxification and treatment. Addicts who at admission attributed to themselves greater responsibility for negative outcomes and who attributed relapse episodes to more personally controllable factors were subsequently (at 6-mo follow-up) more likely either to be completely abstinent or to contain the effects of temporary lapses into opiate use. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP): a brief instrument for assessing treatment outcome

AIM: To develop a brief, multi-dimensional instrument for assessing treatment outcome for people with drug and/or alcohol problems. The Maudsley Addiction Profile (MAP) is the first instrument to be developed in the United Kingdom for this purpose. DESIGN: Field testing with quota-recruitment of problem drug users and problem alcohol users in treatment with researcher and clinician-administered test-retest interviews. SETTING: Two community and two inpatient services at the Bethlem Royal and Maudsley Hospital, London. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (160 drug users and 80 alcohol users) interviewed by eight interviews (four researchers and four clinicians), each of whom interviewed 30 subjects on two occasions. MEASURES: Sixty items across substance use, health risk, physical/psychological health and personal/social functioning domains. FINDINGS: Average completion time of the MAP was 12 minutes. The questionnaire was acceptable to a majority of subjects and performed well with both researcher and clinician interviewers. Internal reliability and feasible concurrent validity assessments of the scales and items were highly satisfactory. Test-retest reliability was good, average intraclass correlation coefficients across eight substances were 0.94 and 0.81 across health risk, health problems, relationship conflict, employment and crime measures. CONCLUSIONS: The MAP can serve as a core research instrument with additional outcome measures added as required. The collection of a set of reliable quantitative measures of problems among drug and alcohol users by research or treatment personnel for outcome evaluation purposes need not be time-consuming.     

Reaching hidden populations of drug users by privileged access interviewers: methodological and practical issues

The methodological issues surrounding the use of a privileged access interviewer team to generate a network sample of drug users are examined. Traditionally network samples have tended to be used by qualitative researchers. Privileged access interviewing provides a mechanism for the application of a structured instrument to a network sampling model. In doing so some problematic issues in this area for structured methodology are overcome, reduced or standardized. The use of this method is appraised in terms of meeting the methodological requirements of the Drug Transitions study. The practical experiences of our group in using a privileged access interviewer team to interview more than 400 heroin users, many of whom were not in contact with treatment services, are discussed. This method is most appropriate for the quick collection of data, from diverse networks of drug users, by use of a structured instrument. Success is likely to be dependent on careful implementation. The ongoing monitoring of data quality is of particular importance, as is good management practice and the establishment of supportive and non exploitative relationships with the interviewer team.     

The National Treatment Outcome Research Study in the United Kingdom: Six-month follow-up outcomes.

The National Treatment Outcome Research Study is the first prospective, multisite treatment outcome investigation of drug users in the United Kingdom. The findings of this influential national study are being used by the Department of Health to formulate purchasing guidance. This article presents data on substance use problems for clients (N?=?1,075) in specialist inpatient, rehabilitation, methadone maintenance, and methadone reduction modalities. The most frequent problem was heroin addiction with associated polydrug use problems. There were differences between modalities in substance use at intake. Clients in residential modalities were older, were more likely to use cocaine and alcohol in addition to opiates, had longer drug careers, and had more previous treatment contact. Substantial improvements in a range of substance use problems were observed at 6-month follow-up among clients in all treatment modalities. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Severity of heroin dependence and HIV risk. II. Sharing injecting equipment

One of the most conspicuous risks of HIV transmission among drug injectors involves sharing injecting equipment which has been contaminated by infected blood. The present study investigates the relationship between severity of dependence upon heroin and the sharing of previously used injecting equipment (passive sharing). Four-hundred-and-eight heroin users were contacted and interviewed. Two-hundred-and-eighty-one (69% of the total heroin sample) had injected drugs on at least one occasion, and 204 of the 281 injectors (73%) had shared injecting equipment on at least one occasion after it had been used by someone else. The more severely dependent heroin injectors were more likely to have shared injecting equipment. As users become more dependent upon heroin, the types of factors which predispose them towards sharing may change. Less dependent users were more likely to use in public and 'social' settings, and they may be more likely to share injecting equipment with people they do not know well. The more dependent users appear to use heroin in private settings and to be at greater risk of sharing with dealers, perhaps because of the urgency of their need for drugs at times when they are in withdrawal. One of the most frequently cited reasons for sharing was that sterile injecting equipment was difficult to obtain. It is a matter for some concern that many of the sharers in our sample (24%) reported having shared used injecting equipment while in custody. There was good overall awareness of the risks of health problems associated with injecting among our subjects. However, awareness of risk was not associated with avoidance of sharing behaviour.