Generative processing and false memories: When there is no cost.

Encoding manipulations (e.g., levels of processing) that facilitate retention often result in greater numbers of false memories, a pattern referred to as the more is less effect (M. P. Toglia, J. S. Neuschatz, & K. A. Goodwin, 1999). The present experiments explored false memories under generative processing. In Experiments 1-3, using Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists with items that were either read or generated, the authors found recognition and recall tests indicated generation effects for true memories but no increases in false memories (i.e., generation at no cost). In Experiment 4, in a departure from the DRM methodology, a cuing procedure resulted in a more is less pattern for congruous generation, and a no cost pattern for incongruous generation. This highlights the critical distinction between these encoding contexts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Incongruous item generation effects: A multiple-cue perspective.

In a series of studies, generation effects were obtained under encoding conditions designed to induce incongruous, unrelated item generation. Exps 1 and 2, using free- and cued-recall measures, respectively, provided evidence that this unrelated generation effect was due to response-specific processing. Exp 3 demonstrated a lack of relation between free recall and indices of clustering. A preliminary protocol study suggested that Ss generate multiple items in their search for appropriate unrelated responses. In Exps 4 and 5, conditions designed to produce more extensive multiple generations demonstrated enhanced free recall. These results supported a multiple-cue account of facilitated recall for incongruous item generation. The multiple-cue perspective is consistent with traditional conceptualizations of memory, such as the principle of congruity, and contemporary distinctions between cue–target relational and item specific processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Efficacy of injectable doramectin in the therapy and control of Dermatobia hominis infestations in Latin America

Three studies were conducted in Latin America, one in Brazil, one in Venezuela and one in Argentina, using a common protocol to investigate the efficacy of a single subcutaneous injection of doramectin at 200 micrograms kg-1 (1 ml per 50 kg) for the treatment and control of Dermatobia hominis infestations in cattle raised under commercial conditions. In each study, two groups of 20 animals each were allocated on the basis of D. hominis nodules present 24 h before treatment to a treated group (T1), or to a control group (T2) which received saline solution at 1 ml per 50 kg of live weight. All cattle were injected in the mid-dorsal cervical region and examined on treatment day and 2, 7, 15 and 30 days post-treatment (p.t.). At each observation day the number of D. hominis nodules was counted and the viability of the larvae inside them was assessed and recorded. Treatment with doramectin was 100% effective in eliminating D. hominis larvae and in controlling the re-establishment of the parasite under field conditions of continuous reinfestation. During the first 48 h p.t., dead larvae of different ages were found outside or partially outside the nodules in animals of the doramectin groups. After 48 h p.t., no live larvae were found inside existing nodules, nor did new nodules develop in animals of the doramectin groups in any of the three studies. When compared with nodule counts in the control group on the same observation day or with parasite burdens on the same animal before treatment, doramectin-treated animals began to eliminate parasitic nodules at 48 h p.t. Efficacy reached 100% at 7 days p.t. and remained at 100% on subsequent observation days (P < 0.05). None of the doramectin-treated animals exhibited any clinical signs of adverse reaction to medication.