Autonomic and eyeblink conditioning are closely related to contingency awareness: Reply to Wiens and ?hman (2002) and Manns et al (2002).

S. Wiens and A. Ohman (see record 2002-00340-002) disputed the conclusion that Pavlovian conditioning is strongly related to contingency awareness (P. F. Lovibond & D. R. Shanks, see record 2002-00340-001) on the basis that an inappropriate definition of awareness was used. J. R. Manns, R. E. Clark, and L. R. Squire (see record 2002-00340-003) contended that delay eyeblink conditioning is independent of awareness. The authors of the present article consider these arguments, highlight several problems in the new studies described by the commentators, and conclude that there is still little evidence for unconscious conditioning in either subliminal autonomic conditioning or eyeblink conditioning. The most parsimonious account of existing data is that a single learning process gives rise to both awareness and conditioned responding. Further progress in evaluating the possibility of unconscious conditioning would be facilitated by the development of more completely specified and testable dual-process models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition.

Three experiments, using a conditioned suppression procedure with 112 male hooded Lister rats, examined the mechanisms of context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Exp I replicated previous demonstrations of context specificity of conditioning and extinction. Conditioning in one context did not necessarily transfer perfectly to another, and if extinction was carried out in a context different from that of conditioning, Ss showed a recovery of suppression when tested in the conditioning context. But both of these results disappeared when the familiarity and associative values of the 2 contexts were equated. Exp II replicated this failure to obtain context specificity of conditioning and extinction, but it did obtain context specificity of latent inhibition. Ss preexposed and conditioned to stimuli in the same context showed more profound latent inhibition than those preexposed and conditioned in different contexts. In Exp III, this effect was replicated. It is concluded that context specificity of conditioning or extinction may arise from the failure to control the associative status of the contexts used, whereas that of latent inhibition can best be explained by A. R. Wagner's (1976, 1981) theory of associative learning. Results offer no support for the view that, under conditions such as these, contexts serve as conditional cues, signaling the relationships between events occurring in their presence. (20 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Is Perruchet’s dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems?

P. Perruchet (1985b) showed a double dissociation of conditioned responses (CRs) and expectancy for an airpuff unconditioned stimulus (US) in a 50% partial reinforcement schedule in human eyeblink conditioning. In the Perruchet effect, participants show an increase in CRs and a concurrent decrease in expectancy for the airpuff across runs of reinforced trials; conversely, participants show a decrease in CRs and a concurrent increase in expectancy for the airpuff across runs of nonreinforced trials. Three eyeblink conditioning experiments investigated whether the linear trend in eyeblink CRs in the Perruchet effect is a result of changes in associative strength of the conditioned stimulus (CS), US sensitization, or learning the precise timing of the US. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that the linear trend in eyeblink CRs is not the result of US sensitization. Experiment 3 showed that the linear trend in eyeblink CRs is present with both a fixed and a variable CS–US interval and so is not the result of learning the precise timing of the US. The results are difficult to reconcile with a single learning process model of associative learning in which expectancy mediates CRs. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus.

In Exp I, 16 New Zealand white rabbits were trained to perform an instrumental head-raising response for sucrose reward. A jaw-movement CR was established to a 2-sec CS by pairing it with sucrose; a control stimulus was unpaired with sucrose. Instrumental responding maintained by a VI 40-sec schedule was enhanced during 10-sec presentations of the paired, but not the unpaired, CS. Responding on a VR 15 schedule was unaffected except on trials on which the pre-CS baseline response rate was low; in such cases the paired CS caused a long-lasting acceleration of responding. Noncontingent presentation of the sucrose reinforcer itself briefly suppressed responding but had no long-term effect. In Exp II (6 Ss), a CS that had been conditioned at a 10-sec duration produced the same pattern of effects as in Exp I, indicating that facilitation resulted from CS presentation rather than from the frustrative effects of nonreinforcement of the CS. In Exp III (16 Ss), an inhibitory CS blocked facilitation by the excitatory CS but did not itself affect instrumental responding. (53 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Resistance to extinction of fear-relevant stimuli: Preparedness or selective sensitization?

Human conditioning research has revealed an apparent resistance to extinction of aversive conditions to pictures of fear-relevant stimuli such as snakes and spiders, supporting M. E. Seligman's (1971) preparedness theory of fears and phobias. This article examines an alternative account based on activation of preexisting response tendencies under threat (selective sensitization). Two experiments demonstrate that selective sensitization of electrodermal responses is attenuated when a fear-relevant stimulus serves as negative conditioned stimulus (CS–), but is maintained when it serves as a positive conditioned stimulus (CS+). Previous extinction results may therefore be due to preservation of initial responding to CS+ but not CS–. Selective sensitization offers a model for the nonassociative activation of fears and phobias to prepotent stimuli under conditions of stress or threat. Possible genetic and cognitive mechanisms are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Inference-based retrospective revaluation in human causal judgments requires knowledge of within-compound relationships.

In an allergist causal-judgment task, food compounds were followed by an allergic reaction (e.g., AB+), and then 1 cue (A) was revalued. Experiment 1, in which participants who were instructed that whatever was true about one element of a causal compound was also true of the other, showed a reverse of the standard retrospective revaluation effect. That is, ratings of B were higher when A was causal (A+) than when A was safe (A-). This effect was taken to reflect inferential reasoning, not an associative mechanism. In Experiment 2, within-compound associations were found to be necessary to produce this inference-based revaluation. Therefore, evidence that within-compound associations are necessary for retrospective revaluation is consistent with the inferential account of causal judgments. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications.

This article reviews research over the past decade concerning the relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and conscious awareness. The review covers autonomic conditioning, conditioning with subliminal stimuli, eyeblink conditioning, conditioning in amnesia, evaluative conditioning, and conditioning under anesthesia. The bulk of the evidence is consistent with the position that awareness is necessary but not sufficient for conditioned performance, although studies suggestive of conditioning without awareness are identified as worthy of further investigation. Many studies have used inadequate measures of awareness, and strategies for increasing validity and sensitivity are discussed. It is concluded that conditioning may depend on the operation of a propositional system associated with consciousness rather than a separate, lower level system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

"Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus". Correction to Lovibond.

Reports an error in the article, "Facilitation of Instrumental Behavior by a Pavlovian Appetitive Conditioned Stimulus" by Peter F. Lovibond (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1983, Jul, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 225-247)." Part of the second sentence on page 227 was omitted, and the correction is presented here. (The following abstract of this article originally appeared in record 1984-08705-001.) In Exp I, 16 New Zealand white rabbits were trained to perform an instrumental head-raising response for sucrose reward. A jaw-movement CR was established to a 2-sec CS by pairing it with sucrose; a control stimulus was unpaired with sucrose. Instrumental responding maintained by a VI 40-sec schedule was enhanced during 10-sec presentations of the paired, but not the unpaired, CS. Responding on a VR 15 schedule was unaffected except on trials on which the pre-CS baseline response rate was low; in such cases the paired CS caused a long-lasting acceleration of responding. Noncontingent presentation of the sucrose reinforcer itself briefly suppressed responding but had no long-term effect. In Exp II (6 Ss), a CS that had been conditioned at a 10-sec duration produced the same pattern of effects as in Exp I, indicating that facilitation resulted from CS presentation rather than from the frustrative effects of nonreinforcement of the CS. In Exp III (16 Ss), an inhibitory CS blocked facilitation by the excitatory CS but did not itself affect instrumental responding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction.

The author tested causal beliefs and conditioned responses in a task involving retrospective revaluation of the causal status of a target cue with respect to electric shock. Successful revaluation was observed on both self-report shock expectancy and skin conductance, whether the training trials were directly experienced, described, or partly experienced and partly described. The results contradict models that link anticipatory conditioned responses to a separate or earlier process from that underlying explicit causal knowledge. They suggest instead that a single learning process gives rise to propositional knowledge that (a) drives anticipatory responding, (b) forms the basis for self-reported causal beliefs, and (c) can be combined with other knowledge, provided either by experience or symbolically, to generate inferences such as retrospective revaluation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)