Fifty Years On: Brown v. Board of Education and American Psychology, 1954-2004 An Introduction.

Introduces the current issue of the American Psychologist, which examines the ramifications of the Brown vs. Board of Education decision and its sequelae over the last 50 years, with a special focus on the mixed role of psychological research and practice. Despite the great strides toward a more just society since May 17, 1954, inequities remain in schooling, in social relations, and in economic opportunity. How will history judge American psychology 50 years from now vis-a-vis the possibilities it helped create via Brown? The articles in this special issue suggest several important directions of research and action our field will need to take if the verdict of history is to be a positive one. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

构建我国法院附设调解制度的理论设想

法院调解制度作为我国民事诉讼中的一项特有制度,在实践中对于及时解决民事纠纷、妥善处理人民内部矛盾、维护社会稳定发挥着积极的作用。但是,随着民事审判方式的改革及群众法治观念的逐渐增强,法院调解制度也显现出诸多的局限性和弊端,严重影响了其积极作用的发挥。以改革现行法院调解制度为契机,构建我国的法院附设调解制度,对于社会的稳定与和谐有着巨大的法律价值和现实意义。     

计算机虚拟现实技术的教学应用与软件的开发研究

提出了利用虚拟现实技术开发的"模拟法庭教学软件",建设<模拟法庭>虚拟实验室,以解决"模拟法庭"数量不足的问题,使每一个学生都参与到实践教学中去,教学效果良好.     

Legal reasoning with subjective logic

Judges and jurors must make decisions in an environment of ignoranceand uncertainty for example by hearing statements of possibly unreliable ordishonest witnesses, assessing possibly doubtful or irrelevantevidence, and enduring attempts by the opponents to manipulate thejudge's and the jurors' perceptions and feelings. Three importantaspects of decision making in this environment are the quantificationof sufficient proof, the weighing of pieces of evidence, and therelevancy of evidence. This paper proposes a mathematical frameworkfor dealing with the two first aspects, namely the quantification ofproof and weighing of evidence. Our approach is based on subjectivelogic, which is an extension of standard logic and probability theory,in which the notion of probability is extended by including degrees ofuncertainty. Subjective Logic is a framework for modelling humanreasoning and we show how it can be applied to legalreasoning.     

The Power of the Brown v. Board of Education Decision: Theorizing Threats to Sustainability.

Interviews with African American and White American elders capture the immediate power of the Brown v. Board of Education (1954) decision and the biography of its impact over time. This article reviews the lived experience of the decision and theorizes 3 threats to sustainability that ruthlessly undermined the decision over time: (a) the unacknowledged and enormous sacrifice endured by the African American community in the name of desegregation; b) the violent and relentless resistance to the decision by government officials, educators, and many White community members; and (c) the dramatic shrinkage of the vision of Brown from the dismantling of White supremacy to a technical matter of busing. Implications are drawn for the study of desegregation and for the study of sustainability of social justice more broadly. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

勃艮第宫廷的服装政治学——以彩绘手稿《让·沃奎林向菲利普三世献书》为例

以《让·沃奎林向菲利普三世献书》为例，分析15世纪勃艮第公爵菲利普三世统治时期，绘画中的服装对图中人物形象的塑造，以及由此形成的勃艮第宫廷独特的服饰文化特征和宫廷文化特点。《让·沃奎林向菲利普三世献书》不但较为全面地反映出15世纪上半叶勃艮第宫廷的服饰时尚，而且兼具复杂的叙事性。采用历史学和比较学的研究方法，将图像中的服装与社会生活、染织技术、宫廷文化等关联起来，剖析服装与历史生活密切相连的复杂结构。以菲利普三世为代表的勃艮第贵族强烈的个人服饰特征，结合骑士精神和壮丽恢宏的宫廷氛围，形成了勃艮第宫廷独特的宫廷文化，塑造了欧洲顶级宫廷的贵族形象。     

城市住宅地下空间利用的新形式

本文针对城市住宅地下空间利用的现状，提出采用“下沉式庭院”增强住宅地下层的可居住性、改善地下居住环境以充分利用地下空间。     

人民法院智能化系统设计探讨

本文阐述了人民法院智能化系统的特殊性,着重介绍了人民法院信息网络系统、数字法庭以及安全技术防范系统的设计.     

Strategies for private practitioners coping with subpoenas or compelled testimony for client records or test data.

Psychologists have numerous ethical, professional, and legal obligations regarding the release of client records, test data, and other information in the legal context. The demands of the legal system sometimes conflict with psychologists' ethical obligations to maintain confidentiality of client records, to protect the integrity and security of test materials, and to avoid misuse of assessment techniques and data. This article identifies legal issues that may arise when private practitioners are faced with subpoenas or compelled court testimony for client records or test data and suggests strategies that might be considered in the event such a subpoena or demand is received. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

我国刑事诉讼辩诉交易制度引入的障碍分析

辩诉交易制度对于提高刑事诉讼效率具有积极意义，但在我国刑事诉讼中引入这一制度尚存在着一定的障碍．从在制度和观念上尚未完整地确立无罪推定原则、公诉案件控辩双方诉讼地位悬殊、刑事诉讼中无证据开示制度以及刑事诉讼立法关注被害人的趋势等方面进行了分析．