| 下出料门支撑梁设计方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 魏化中,张嘉琳,王友.下出料门支撑梁设计方法的比较[J].化工设备与管道,2006,43(3):44-46. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 魏化中 张嘉琳 王友 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉化工学院机械工程学院,武汉,430074
2. 中国医药集团武汉医药设计院,武汉,430077 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 分析下出料门支撑梁的变形和强度对设备安全性能影响时,用有限元方法(ANSYS软件)和工程力学(材料力学)的方法分别进行计算、分析、比较。材料力学分析结果相对ANSYS软件分析结果较为保守,也欠精确,偏离实际的程度比较大。因此在分析类似工程问题中运用ANSYS分析更具有现实意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 支撑梁 材料力学 有限元ANSYS |
| 文章编号： | 1009-3281(2006)03-0044-03 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-06-28 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-08-30 |
Comparison of Design Methods for Support Beam of Lower Discharge Gate |
| |
| Wei Huazhong,Zhang Jialin,Wang You.Comparison of Design Methods for Support Beam of Lower Discharge Gate[J].Process Equipment & Piping,2006,43(3):44-46. |
| |
| Authors: | Wei Huazhong Zhang Jialin Wang You |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Chemical Technology Wuhan 430074; 2. SINOPHRAM Wuhan Pharmaceutical Industry Design Institute Wuhan 430077 |
| |
| Abstract: | In analyzing the deformation and the strength of support beam of lower discharge gate,finite element method(by using ANSYS) and engineering mechanics method(strength of material) were used respectively.The results of two methods were,then,analyzed and compared.The result from engineering mechanics method was conservative compared to that from ANSYS.The result of engineering mechanics method has poor precision and large deviation.Thus,it is recommended that use of ANSYS will be more significant in practical engineering. |
| |
| Keywords: | support beam strength of material finite element |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
