Another view of progress in validity generalization: Reply to Schmidt, Hunter, and Pearlman. |
| |
| Authors: | Callender, John C. Osburn, H. G. |
| |
| Abstract: | Refutes the F. L. Schmidt et al (see record 1983-07150-001) argument that the present authors' (see record 1981-27033-001) work on validity generalization models contained erroneous conclusions. Modifications to past practices in computing and reporting variance estimates are recommended. (3 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
