Sex effects on performance ratings on manager–subordinate dyads: A field study.

Tested the hypothesis of N. Schmitt et al (see record 1980-33528-001) that people rate those similar to themselves with more confidence, which is reflected in larger variances in performance ratings. 286 manager–subordinate dyads in all 4 sex combinations comprised the sample. Subordinates rated managers on the Behavioral Observation Scales (BOS), and managers rated subordinates using the Minnesota Satisfactoriness Scales (MSS). Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance revealed that female subordinates produced significantly more variability when rating their male managers than when rating their female managers on total BOS rating. Female managers produced more variable ratings of male subordinates than for female subordinates on total MSS rating. Male subordinates and managers did not produce more variable BOS or MSS ratings when appraising other males than when rating females. Results are discussed in terms of role expectations. (24 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)