A comparison of hydrogen storage technologies for solar-powered stand-alone power supplies: A photovoltaic system sizing approach

This paper compares the performance of three different solar based technologies for a stand-alone power supply (SAPS) using different methods to address the seasonal variability of solar insolation—(i) photovoltaic (PV) panels with battery storage; (ii) PV panels with electrolyser and hydrogen (_H2)$({\mathrm{H}}_2)$ storage; and (iii) photoelectrolytic (PE) dissociation of water for _H2${\mathrm{H}}_2$ generation and storage. The system size is determined at three different Australian locations with greatly varying latitudes—Darwin (12^°S${12}^{°}\mathrm{S}$), Melbourne (38^°S${38}^{°}\mathrm{S}$) and Macquarie Island (55^°S${55}^{°}\mathrm{S}$). While the PV/electrolyser system requires fewer PV panels compared to the PV/battery scenario due to the seasonal storage ability of _H2${\mathrm{H}}_2$, the final number of PV modules is only marginally less at the highest latitude due to the lower energy recovery efficiency of _H2${\mathrm{H}}_2$ compared to batteries. For the PE technology, an upper limit on the cost of such a system is obtained if it is to be competitive with the existing PV/battery technology.