首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

葡萄酒活性干酵母直投和活化工艺对酒精发酵的影响
引用本文:刘苑琳,李辉,张衡,杨华,刘玲彦,邓娟娟,卢发,柳志杰,熊丽娇,许引虎.葡萄酒活性干酵母直投和活化工艺对酒精发酵的影响[J].中国酿造,2019,38(9):102.
作者姓名:刘苑琳  李辉  张衡  杨华  刘玲彦  邓娟娟  卢发  柳志杰  熊丽娇  许引虎
作者单位:(1.湖北工业大学 生物工程与食品学院,湖北 武汉 430064;2.湖北省酵母功能重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443003;3.安琪酵母股份有限公司,湖北 宜昌 4430034;4.湖北省宜昌市中心人民医院,湖北 宜昌 443003)
摘    要:选取了6种国内外不同的葡萄酒活性干酵母,分别采用活化与直投工艺,在15 ℃和25 ℃条件下,验证其酒精发酵的代谢动力学及甘油产量的差异。结果表明,在15 ℃发酵条件下,部分活性干酵母直投接种比活化接种晚一天结束发酵;F1酵母活化与直投处理间甘油产量没有显著差异(P>0.05),其他5种酵母活化工艺发酵的葡萄酒甘油产量显著高于直投工艺(P<0.05);在25 ℃发酵条件下,活化接种和直投接种均在同一天完成酒精发酵,最终残糖均<4 g/L;F1酵母活化与直投接种之间的甘油产量没有显著的差异(P>0.05),A2酵母活化接种后葡萄酒的甘油产量显著低于直投工艺(P<0.05),其他4种葡萄酒活性干酵母活化后的甘油产量明显高于直投工艺(P<0.05)。与活化后接种相比,直投接种可能延长发酵时间,降低甘油产量。

关 键 词:葡萄酒  活性干酵母  接种方法  甘油  
收稿时间:2019-10-15

Effects of direct inoculation and re-activated inoculation of active dry yeast on wine fermentation
LIU Yuanlin,LI Hui,ZHANG Heng,YANG Hua,LIU Lingyan,DENG Juanjuan,LU Fa,LIU Zhijie,XIONG Lijiao,XU Yinhu.Effects of direct inoculation and re-activated inoculation of active dry yeast on wine fermentation[J].China Brewing,2019,38(9):102.
Authors:LIU Yuanlin  LI Hui  ZHANG Heng  YANG Hua  LIU Lingyan  DENG Juanjuan  LU Fa  LIU Zhijie  XIONG Lijiao  XU Yinhu
Affiliation:(1.College of Bioengineering and Food Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430064, China; 2.Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Yeast Function, Yichang 443003, China; 3.Angel yeast Co., Ltd., Yichang 443003, China; 4.Central People's Hospital of Yichang City, Hubei Province, Yichang 443003, China)
Abstract:Six different domestic and international wine active dry yeasts were selected, using re-activated and direct inoculation processes, and the difference in alcohol fermentation and glycerol production was analyzed under the conditions of 15 ℃ and 25 ℃, respectively. The results showed that under the fermentation condition of 15 ℃, some active dry yeasts with re-activated inoculation finished the alcohol fermentation one day earlier than the direct inoculation one. There was no significant difference in glycerol production between F1 re-activated and direct inoculation (P>0.05), and the glycerol production of the other five wine inoculated by re-activated dry yeasts was significantly higher than the direct inoculation process (P<0.05). Under the conditions of alcoholic fermentation at 25 ℃, re-activated inoculation and direct inoculation completed the alcohol fermentation on the same day, and the final residual sugar was less than 4g/L. There was no significant differences in the yield of glycerol between F1 re-activated and direct inoculation (P>0.05). The yield of glycerol after re-activated inoculation of yeast A2 was significantly lower than that of direct inoculation, and the yield of glycerol of the other four wine fermented by re-activated dry yeasts was significantly higher than that by direct inoculation (P<0.05). Direct inoculation may prolong fermentation time and reduce glycerol production compared to re-activated inoculation.
Keywords:wine  active dry yeast  inoculation method  glycerol  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国酿造》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国酿造》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号