首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

某阶梯溢洪道与光滑溢洪道水力特性对比
引用本文:赵信峰,徐鹏. 某阶梯溢洪道与光滑溢洪道水力特性对比[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(9): 77-80
作者姓名:赵信峰  徐鹏
作者单位:黄河水利职业技术学院, 河南 开封 475004
基金项目:水利部堤防安全与病害防治工程技术研究中心开放课题基金项目;国家自然科学基金-河南省人才培养联合基金项目(U1304503)
摘    要:某溢洪道工程原设计方案采用光滑溢洪道,但光滑溢洪道出口流速较大,挑距较远,对右岸岸坡造成冲刷破坏。对此,提出采用阶梯溢洪道替换光滑溢洪道的设计方案。为定量分析两种溢洪道水力特性,采用水工模型试验与数值模拟试验相结合的方法做了对比分析。结果表明,阶梯溢洪道的消能率明显大于光滑溢洪道的消能率,有效减小了溢洪道出口流速和挑距,避免了对下游岸坡的冲刷,该修正方案合理。研究成果可为类似工程提供参考。

关 键 词:光滑溢洪道; 阶梯溢洪道; 水力特性; 模型试验; 数值模拟

Hydraulic Characteristics Comparison of Stepped Spillway and Smooth Spillway
Abstract:The outlet velocity and jet trajectory length in the original design of spillway project with smooth spillway were large, and it caused the scour of right bank. Affected by the downstream terrain, the stepped spillway was used to replace the smooth spillway. The hydraulic characteristics of smooth spillway and the stepped spillway were compared by using the numerical simulation method and physical model test. The results show that the energy dissipation rate of the stepped spillway is larger than that of smooth spillway and it can effectively reduce the outlet velocity and jet trajectory length to avoid damaging the downstream bank slope; the smooth spillway replaced by the stepped spillway was reasonable. The research provides reference for the similar projects.
Keywords:smooth spillway   stepped spillway   hydraulic characteristic   physical test   numerical simulation
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《水电能源科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《水电能源科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号