Energy policy tools for agricultural residues utilization for heat and power generation: A case study of sugarcane trash in Thailand

Cane trash could viably substitute fossil fuels in heat and power generation projects to avoid air pollution from open burning and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. It is competitive with bituminous and other agro-industrial biomass. Using cane trash for heat generation project could provide a higher reliability and return on investment than power generation project. The heat generation project could be viable (Financial Internal Rate of Return, FIRR = 36–81%) without feedstock subsidy. With current investment and support conditions, the capacity of 5 MW option of power generation project is the most viable (FIRR = 13.6–15.3%); but 30 MW, 1 MW and 10 MW options require feedstock subsidy 450–1100 Baht/t-cane trash to strengthen financial viability. Furthermore, the revenue from carbon credit sales could compensate the revenue from current energy price adder and increases 0.5–1.0% FIRR of power generation project. Using cane trash for 1 MW power generation could reduce GHG emission 637–861 t CO₂eq and avoid air pollutant emissions of 3.35 kg nitrogen oxides (NO_x), 0.41 kg sulfur oxides (SO_x) and 2.05 kg volatile organic compounds (VOC). Also, 1 t steam generation from cane trash could avoid pollutant emissions of 0.6 kg NO_x, 0.07 kg SO_x, and 0.37 kg VOC. The potential of cane trash to cause fouling/slagging as well as erosion are not significantly different from other biomass, but chlorinated organic compounds and NO_x could be higher than bituminous and current biomass feedstock at sugar mill (bagasse and rice husk).