| 高放废液玻璃固化体和矿物固化体性质的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何涌.高放废液玻璃固化体和矿物固化体性质的比较[J].辐射防护,2001,21(1):43-47. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何涌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国地质大学武汉材料科学与工程学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家留学基金回国科研资助费资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对高放废液玻璃固化体和矿物固化体的性能作了比较和分析。矿物固化体较玻璃固化体有下列优势 :体积小、高放废液组分掺入量高、核素浸出率低。高放废液矿物固化体的稳定性分析表明 ,它们十分适合于地下处置库的潮湿和温度变化的环境。虽然单种矿物只能处理部分高放废液组分 ,但多种矿物集合起来可荷载高放废液的全部组分
|
| 关 键 词： | 高放废液 玻璃固化体 矿物固化体 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999年12月16 |
COMPARISON OF THE PROPERTIES OF GLASS AND MINERAL HOSTS FOR HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE |
| |
| He Yong.COMPARISON OF THE PROPERTIES OF GLASS AND MINERAL HOSTS FOR HIGH-LEVEL NUCLEAR WASTE[J].Radiation Protection,2001,21(1):43-47. |
| |
| Authors: | He Yong |
| |
| Abstract: | By comparing glass and mineral hosts for HLW, author discussed their properties. Mineral hosts are obviously better than the glass in many aspects, such as smaller volume, large amount of HLW incorporated, lower leaching rate, and so on. Analysis of the stabilities of the mineral hosts shows that they especially fit the situation of a HLW repository in deep underground with damp air and changing temperatures. Even though single phase minerals could just host limited HLW components, multiphase mineral hosts may host all HLW components. ( |
| |
| Keywords: | HLW Glass Mineral HosX |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
