首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

拱式地铁站结构地震响应对比分析及结构优化
引用本文:周晔,戚承志,陈国兴,陈苏. 拱式地铁站结构地震响应对比分析及结构优化[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(4): 975-983
作者姓名:周晔  戚承志  陈国兴  陈苏
作者单位:1.北京建筑大学 土木与交通工程学院,北京 100044;2.南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,南京 210009;3.江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,南京 210009
基金项目:北京市属高等学校创新团队建设与教师职业发展计划项目(IDHT20130512),国家自然基金(51174012),北京市自然科学基金(KZ200810016007),国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(2010CB732003)
摘    要:用有限差分分析软件FLAC3D,建立了土-地铁站结构相互作用的非线性动力数值计算模型。分析了相同埋深及地质环境下,两种连拱式地铁站结构在不同地震动作用下的动应力、相对位移和加速度响应规律,总结了两种地铁车站结构形式在抗震性能方面的优缺点。并对Z1型地铁站的结构形式进行了两种优化,用数值方法检验了优化后车站结构的抗震性能。检验结果表明,优化方案B具有较好的抗震性能:在Kobe波作用下,Mises应力峰值下降14.8%,最大主应力峰值下降18.8%;在Loma Prieta波作用下,Mises应力峰值下降7%,最大主应力峰值下降23.2%。

关 键 词:拱形结构  地铁车站  地震反应  对比分析  
收稿时间:2015-06-13

Contrastive Analysis of Seismic Response of Multi-Arch Subway Station Structures and Structure Optimization
Zhou Ye,Qi Chengzhi,Chen Guoxing,Chen Su. Contrastive Analysis of Seismic Response of Multi-Arch Subway Station Structures and Structure Optimization[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(4): 975-983
Authors:Zhou Ye  Qi Chengzhi  Chen Guoxing  Chen Su
Affiliation:1.School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing100044, P. R. China; 2.Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China; 3.Civil Engineering & Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing 210009, P. R. China
Abstract:The FDM software FLAC3Dwas adopted for non-linear dynamic numerical computation modelsto model soil-structureinteraction of metro station. The seismic dynamic stress, horizontal relative displacement and acceleration response of two kinds of multi-arch subway station structures at the same buried depth and geological environment conditions were analyzed. Both the advantages and disadvantages of the two subway station structures in seismic resistance were summarized. Furthermore, the Z1 type of subway station structure was optimized by two variants, and the seismic performance of the optimized station structure is verified by numerical method. The numerical results show that the optimization variant B has better anti-seismic property. Under Kobe ground motion,the peak of Von Mises stress dropped by 14.8%, and the peak of maximum principal stress dropped by 18.8%, and that the peak of Von Mises stress dropped by 7%, and the peak value of maximum principal stress dropped by 23.2% under Loma Prieta ground motion.
Keywords:arch structure  subway station  seismic response  contrastive analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地下空间与工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地下空间与工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号