Integrated CMOS GSM baseband channel selecting filters realized using switched capacitor finite impulse response technique

A problem of the design and optimization of analog channel selecting filters, which are needed in wireless communication systems, is considered and evaluated in this paper on an example of the baseband GSM (global system for mobile telephony) channel filter. Two versions of this filter, both designed by the authors using switched-capacitor finite impulse response (SC FIR) technique, are presented and compared to each other as well as to other concurrent designs. In order to fully and plausibly compare the both filter versions (the newer and the elder one), the authors decided to design and fabricate both filters using the same technology, i.e., the technology of the elder filter version, which is the two metal, two poly CYE CMOS 0.8 μm process. The conclusions, which have been drawn, are, however, general and to a large extent technology independent.Although both presented filters are switched-capacitor (SC) finite impulse response (FIR) systems Dąbrowski A, Cetnarowicz D, Długosz R, Pawłowski P. Design and optimisation of integrated CMOS FIR SC channel filter for a GSM Receiver, European Conference on Circuit Theory and Design, Helsinki, 28–31 August 2001. p I.265; Długosz R, Dąbrowski A, Pawłowski P. Design and measurement results of the GSM SC FIR channel filter realized in CMOS 0.8 μm technology. In: 9th international conference mixed design of integrated circuits and systems, 2002. p. 607–12] they essentially differ to each other as they are based on two quite different SC FIR delay line structures. In the first filter version Gillingham delay elements Gillingham P. Stray-free switched-capacitor unit delay circuit. Electron lett 1984;20(7):308–10] are used, while in the second version even and odd delay elements Dąbrowski A. Multirate and multiphase switched-capacitors circuits, London: Chapman & Hall; 1997; Dąbrowski A, Menzi U, Moschytz GS. Design of switched-capacitor FIR filters with application to a low-power MFSK receiver. IEE Proceedings-G 1992;139(4):450] are alternately connected to form the delay line. In this way an interesting comparison of these two SC delay line concepts has been possible.It should also be stressed that the frequency responses of both presented filters have been designed using the same technique, i.e., the Kaiser window of order N = 31. The upper frequency is in both cases equal to 500 kHz and the frequency of the controlling clock generator is equal to 1 MHz.The filter with Gillingham delay elements dissipates 30 mW with the 3 V supply voltage and occupies 2.2 mm². On the contrary, the even–odd SC FIR filter dissipates 18 mW only with the 3 V supply voltage and occupies 2.4 mm². Moreover, the newer filter version has the stopband attenuation greater by about 10 dB than the previous version.