首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于未知扰动的冲突证据合成方法
引用本文:林作铨,牟克典,韩庆. 基于未知扰动的冲突证据合成方法[J]. 软件学报, 2004, 15(8): 1150-1156
作者姓名:林作铨  牟克典  韩庆
作者单位:北京大学,数学科学学院,信息科学系,北京,100871
基金项目:Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.69925203, 60373002 (国家自然科学基金)
摘    要:自从发现Dempster合成可能导致悖论以来,冲突证据合成一直是Dempster-Shafer理论的重要研究方向之一,迄今尚未有统一的解决方法被广泛接受.提出一种新的冲突证据合成方法,即在Dempster合成之前,基于未知扰动对mass函数进行预处理,并通过预处理来解决标准化问题.与其他相关方法相比,这种新方法不仅和Dempster规则形式上一致,合成过程比较灵活,并且可以通过扩展的Bayes公式得到理论上的解释.

关 键 词:不确定推理  Dempster-Shafer理论  冲突证据合成
文章编号:1000-9825/2004/15(08)1150
收稿时间:2003-03-19
修稿时间:2003-03-19

An Approach to Combination of Conflicting Evidences by Disturbance of Ignorance
LIN Zuo-Quan,MU Ke-Dian and HAN Qing. An Approach to Combination of Conflicting Evidences by Disturbance of Ignorance[J]. Journal of Software, 2004, 15(8): 1150-1156
Authors:LIN Zuo-Quan  MU Ke-Dian  HAN Qing
Abstract:The combination of conflicting evidences has been one of the important issues in Dempster-Shafer theory since the example of Zadeh paradox produced by Dempsters rule of combination was found. There is no solution accepted universally as yet. In this paper, an approach to handling this problem is proposed. Before adopting the Dempsters rule to combine belief functions, the assignments of mass functions are pretreated by the disturbance of ignorance. The pretreatment is in favor of the normalization of combination. Compared with other alternatives, the new approach is consistent with Dempsters rule in the form and flexible to combination, especially, it can be theoretically explained by the generalized Bayesian formula.
Keywords:uncertain reasoning  Dempster-Shafer theory  combination of conflicting evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《软件学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《软件学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号