| Abstract: | To investigate the preference for unpredictable rewards predicted by the present author and J. T. Daly's (see record 1983-20275-001) modification, known as the DMOD model, of R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner's (1972) previous model of reinforcement, the present author conducted 5 E-maze experiments with 144 male Holtzman rats. In Exps I–V, Ss were given a choice between receiving reward and nonreward in a situation in which stimuli were correlated with reward outcome (predictable situation) vs a situation in which the stimuli were uncorrelated with reward outcome (unpredictable situation). Preference for the unpredictable situation occurred under the following conditions: small (1 37-mg pellet) immediate rewards, small delayed (15-sec) rewards when the cues correlated with reward outcome were absent during the delay interval, large (15 pellets) immediate rewards when a difficult discrimination was required, and when the stimulus predicting nonreward was present at the choice point. Preference for the predictable situation was strongest if reinforcement was delayed and large or if the stimulus predicting reward was present at the choice point. A weaker preference for the predictable situation occurred if reinforcement was immediate, large, and required a simple discrimination or if reinforcement was large and delayed and the cues that correlated with reward outcome were absent during the delay interval. Findings support the predictions of the DMOD model of appetitive learning. (33 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved) |
