首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Preparation and characterization of three-dimensional nanostructured macroporous bacterial cellulose/agarose scaffold for tissue engineering
Authors:Chunxi?Yang,Chuan?Gao,Yizao?Wan,Tingting?Tang,Shuhong?Zhang,Kerong?Dai  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:krdai@.com"   title="  krdai@.com"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author
Affiliation:(1) Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopaedic Implant, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200011, People’s Republic of China;(2) Research Institute of Composite Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, People’s Republic of China;(3) Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, 225 South Chongqing Road, Shanghai, 200025, People’s Republic of China;(4) Engineering Research Center of Digital Medicine, Ministry of Education, PRC, 1954 Huashan Road, Shanghai, 200030, People’s Republic of China;
Abstract:We fabricated a three-dimensional nanostructured macroporous bacterial cellulose scaffold (3D BC scaffold) and a three-dimensional nanostructured macroporous bacterial cellulose/agarose scaffold (3D BC/A). Results of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and mercury intrusion porosimeter showed that both the 3D BC and the 3D BC/A have interconnected macropores characterized by nanofibrous pore walls (The diameter of the dominant pores was about 100 μm and ranges from <1 μm to >1,000 μm). 3D BC/A also has high surface area (80 ± 5 m2/g) and sufficient porosity (88.5 ± 0.4%) compare with 3D BC (surface area: 92.81 ± 2.02 m2/g; porosity 90.42 ± 0.24%). 3D BC/A do support C5.18 cell and hBMSC attachment, proliferation evaluated with SEM, confocal microscopy and cell proliferation assay. Furthermore, 3D/ABC has enhanced mechanical property (ultimate compressive strength: 26.26 ± 4.6 kPa, Young’s modulus: 39.26 ± 5.72 kPa)) than that 3D/BC has (ultimate compressive strength: 7.04 ± 2.34 kPa, Young’s modulus: 10.76 ± 3.52 kPa). Overall, the 3D BC/A scaffold had more potential than 3D BC scaffold for using as a scaffold for tissue engineering and tissue repair applications.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号