Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Production Engineering Department, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia 721 657, East Midnapur, West Bengal, India;2. Mechanical Engineering Department, MCKV Institute of Engineering, Howrah 711 204, West Bengal, India;3. Department of Production Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India;1. Centre for Composite Materials and Structures, Harbin Institute of Technology, China;2. University of California, Irvine, USA;3. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China;1. Manufacturing Research Center, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil;2. Institute for Sustainable Manufacturing (ISM), University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA;1. Institut d’Electronique, de Microélectronique et de Nanotechnologies (IEMN), Université de Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, ISEN, Université de Valenciennes, UMR 8520 - IEMN, F-59000, Lille, France;2. Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l’Energie (RS2E), CNRS FR 3459, 33 rue Saint Leu, 80039, Amiens Cedex, France;3. Institut des Matériaux Jean Rouxel (IMN), CNRS UMR 6502 – Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière BP32229, 44322, Nantes cedex 3, France;4. Unité de Catalyse et de Chimie du Solide (UCCS), Fédération Chevreul, Université de Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, ENSCL, Université d’Artois, UMR 8181 – UCCS, F-59000, Lille, France;1. VNRVJIET,Bachupally,Hyderabad,India,;2. GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, India;3. VNRVJIET,Bachupally,Hyderabad,India;1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, 76 Proszkowska St., 45-758 Opole, Poland;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sinop University, Sinop, Turkey;1. Department of Production and Industrial Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand 831014, India;2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jalpaiguri Government Engineering College, Jalpaiguri, West Bengal 735102, India;3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India |
| |
| Abstract: | In today’s metalworking industry, many types of materials, ranging from high carbon steel to ceramics and diamonds, are used as cutting tools. Because of the wide range of conditions and requirements, no single cutting tool material meets all the needs of machining applications. Each tool material has its own properties and characteristics that make it best for a specific machining application. While evaluating a cutting tool material for a machining operation, the applicability is dependant on having the correct combination of its physical properties. Thus, it is extensively important to select the most appropriate cutting tool material with the desired properties for enhanced machining performance. This paper considers an exhaustive list of 19 cutting tool materials whose performance are evaluated based on ten selection criteria. The grey complex proportional assessment (COPRAS-G) method is then applied to solve this cutting tool material selection problem considering grey data in the decision matrix. Synthetic single crystal and polycrystal diamonds emerge out as the best two choices. Oil quenched tool steel (AISI O2) and powder metal tool steel (AISI A11) may also be used as the suitable cutting tool materials. Sialon and sintered reaction bonded silicon nitride are the worst chosen cutting tool materials. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
