Fire performance studies on glass-reinforced plastic laminates

Polyester, epoxy and phenolic glass-reinforced laminates were compared in terms of their fire properties in the cone calorimeter. The presence of a gel coat on the polyester and epoxy products had some effect, mainly in the FR grades. The FR polyester with a brominated flame retardant showed a marked decrease in rate of heat release and in rate of smoke production. Aluminium hydroxide (commonly called alumina trihydrate of ATH) caused a significant delay in ignition time for the epoxy product and some reduction in rate of heat release but rate of smoke release was still relatively high. Phenolic laminates showed a long ignition time and relatively low rate of heat release (RHR). The peak RHR was further reduced by the presence of aluminium hydroxide and by changing the type of glass reinforcement. The influence of thickness was explored for a series of phenolic laminates in both cone calorimeter and the International Maritime Organization (IMO) surface flammability test. Ignition delay time was significantly affected and the cone calorimeter results showed that the shape of the RHR curve was also changed as the thickness increased. However, the heat release measurements in the IMO test were not sensitive enough to pick up the differences in this property. The type of substrate under the laminate significantly altered the burning rate but this may have been because they were not glued or mechanically fixed.