首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

食品中大肠杆菌O157:H7的几种检测方法的比较
引用本文:周勇,张晶,侯水平,邓志爱,吴新伟,陈守义,杨智聪. 食品中大肠杆菌O157:H7的几种检测方法的比较[J]. 中国食品卫生杂志, 2012, 0(1): 27-30
作者姓名:周勇  张晶  侯水平  邓志爱  吴新伟  陈守义  杨智聪
作者单位:广州市疾病预防控制中心
基金项目:广州市医药卫生科技项目(2009-YB-125);广州市卫生局医药卫生科技重点项目(2006-Zdi-11)
摘    要:目的评估平板分离培养法、免疫磁珠分离(IMS)法、VIDAS全自动酶标免疫测试系统、BAX全自动病原菌检测系统及环介导等温扩增(LAMP)技术在食品中检验肠出血型大肠埃希菌O157∶H7的特异性、敏感性。方法使用平板分离培养法、免疫磁珠分离法、VIDAS法、BAX法及LAMP法对人工制备的染菌猪肉样本进行检测,并对这几种方法进行比较。结果 BAX法和LAMP法的检出率最高,分别是89.1%和85.9%,免疫磁珠法和VIDAS法检出率次之,分别是75.0%和78.1%,传统分离培养法为43.8%。结论 BAX法和LAMP法具有快速、高效、特异性好、敏感性高的特点,可快速筛选食品中可能存在的肠出血型大肠埃希菌O157∶H7。

关 键 词:大肠杆菌O157:H7  BAX全自动病原菌检测系统  环介导等温扩增  检测方法  食源性致病菌

Comparison of methods detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in foods
Zhou Yong,Zhang Jing,Hou Shuiping,Deng Zhiai,Wu Xinwei,Chen Shouyi,Yang Zhicong. Comparison of methods detecting Escherichia coli O157:H7 in foods[J]. Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene, 2012, 0(1): 27-30
Authors:Zhou Yong  Zhang Jing  Hou Shuiping  Deng Zhiai  Wu Xinwei  Chen Shouyi  Yang Zhicong
Affiliation:(Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Guangzhou 510440,China)
Abstract:Objective To examine the specificity and sensitivity of traditional cultural method,immunomagnetic beads separation method(IMS),VIDAS,BAX and Loop-mediated isothermal amplification(LAMP) method for the detection of O157∶H7 in foods.Methods Traditional cultural method,IMS,VIDAS,BAX and LAMP method were used and compared in detecting O157∶H7 in pork samples.Results The detection rate of BAX,LAMP,IMS and VIDAS method was 89.1%,85.9%,75.0% and 78.1% respectively,while that of traditional cultural method was only 43.8%.Conclusion BAX and LAMP method were proved to be rapid,highly effective,specific and sensitive for the detection of O157∶H7 in foods.
Keywords:Escherachia coli O157∶H7  BAX  loop-mediated isothermal amplification(LAMP)  detection methods  foodborne pathogens
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号