Systematic evaluation of design choices for software development tools |
| |
Authors: | Mark A Toleman Jim Welsh |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Mathematics & Computing,The University of Southern Queensland,Toowoomba,Australia;2.Software Verification Research Centre,The University of Queensland,Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Most design and evaluation of software tools is based on the intuition and experience of the designers. Software tool designers consider themselves typical users of the tools that they build and tend to subjectively evaluate their products rather than objectively evaluate them using established usability methods. This subjective approach is inadequate if the quality of software tools is to improve and the use of more systematic methods is advocated. This paper summarises a sequence of studies that show how user interface design choices for software development tools can be evaluated using established usability engineering techniques. The techniques used included guideline review, predictive modelling and experimental studies with users. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|