首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Footprint handover rerouting protocol for low Earth orbit satellite networks
Authors:Uzunalio?lu  Hüseyin  Akyildiz  Ian F  Yesha  Yelena  Yen  Wei
Affiliation:(1) Bell Labs Advanced Technologies, Lucent Technologies, 101 Crawfords Corner Road, Holmdel, NJ 07701, USA;(2) Broadband and Wireless Networking Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA;(3) Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maryland at BC, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA, also with;(4) Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA CESDIS, Code 930.5, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA;(5) Mitsubishi Telecommunications Network Division, 3885 Crestwood Parkway, Suite 300, Duluth, GA 30096, USA
Abstract:Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks will be an integral part of the next generation telecommunications infrastructures. In a LEO satellite network, satellites and their individual coverage areas move relative to a fixed observer on Earth. To ensure that ongoing calls are not disrupted as a result of satellite movement, calls should be transferred or handed over to new satellites. Since two satellites are involved in a satellite handover, connection route should be modified to include the new satellite into the connection route. The route change can be achieved by augmenting the existing route with the new satellite or by completely rerouting the connection. Route augmentation is simple to implement, however the resulting route is not optimal. Complete rerouting achieves optimal routes at the expense of signaling overhead. In this paper, we introduce a handover rerouting protocol that maintains the optimality of the initial route without performing a routing algorithm after intersatellite handovers. The FHRP makes use of the footprints of the satellites in the initial route as the reference for rerouting. More specifically, after an optimum route has been determined during the call establishment process, the FHRP ensures that the new route due to handover is also optimum. The FHRP demands easy processing, signaling, and storage costs. The performance results show that the FHRP performs similar to a network without any handovers in terms of call blocking probability.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号