首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


RAMI analysis of the ITER CIS
Affiliation:1. ITER Project unit, Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA), Naka, Ibaraki, Japan;2. ITER Organization, Route de Vinon sur Verdon, Saint Paul Lez Durance 13115, France;1. Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China;2. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland;3. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China;1. Fusion Energy Engineering Laboratory (FEEL), Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) Barcelona-Tech, Barcelona, Spain;2. Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión por Confinamiento Magnético – CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain;1. Fusion for Energy Agency (F4E), Torres Diagonal Litoral B3, Josep Pla 2, 08019 Barcelona, Spain;2. ITER Organization, Route de Vinon sur Verdon, 13115 Saint Paul Lez Durance, France;1. ENEA FSN Department, Via E. Fermi, 45, 00044, Frascati, Rome, Italy;2. EURO fusion Consortium, Boltzmannstr.2, Garching, 85748, Germany;3. Ansaldo Nucleare, C.so F.M. Perrone, 25, 16152, Genova, Italy
Abstract:ITER is the first worldwide international project aiming to design a device that proves the physics and technological basis for fusion power plants to produce nuclear fusion energy. In the project, the RAMI approach (reliability, availability, maintainability and inspectability) has been adopted for technical risk control to guide the design of components in preparation for operation and maintenance. RAMI analysis of the ITER central interlock system (CIS), which shall provide investment protection for the ITER systems was performed on the conceptual design. A functional breakdown was prepared in a bottom-up approach, resulting in the system being divided into 5 main functions and 7 sub-functions which are described using the IDEFØ method. Reliability block diagrams (RBDs) were prepared to estimate the reliability and availability of each function under stipulated operating conditions. Initial and expected scenarios were analyzed to define risk-mitigation actions. The inherent availability of the ITER CIS expected after implementation of mitigating actions was calculated to be 99.86% over 2 years, which is the typical interval of the scheduled maintenance cycles. A failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) was performed to initiate risk mitigation action. Criticality matrices highlight the risks of the different failure modes with regard to the probability of their occurrence and impact on operations. It was assessed that the availability of the ITER CIS, with appropriate mitigating actions applied, meets the project availability requirement for the system.
Keywords:RAMI  Availability  Nuclear fusion  ITER  Interlock  CIS
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号