Initial comfort of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel contact lenses versus etafilcon A contact lenses for extended wear.

PURPOSE: To compare the initial comfort afforded by silicone hydrogel lenses (lotrafilcon A) versus the comfort afforded by conventional hydrogel lenses (etafilcon A) in extended wear (EW). DESIGN: Prospective, double-masked and randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Lotrafilcon A and etafilcon A contact lenses were eye randomly fitted on an EW basis for 7 days and nights in 20 subjects. A forced-choice subject preference questionnaire was made. Subjects were comfort, dryness, red eye and visual quality after night wear and at the end of the day. Subjective scored satisfaction (scale: 1-5) and lens preference were assessed. RESULTS: Lotrafilcon A proved more comfortable after night wear (60%, CI95% 38-82%) and at the end of the day (70%, CI95% 49-90%) than etafilcon A after night wear (10%, CI95% 0-23%, P<0.05) and at the end of the day (20%, CI95% 2-38%, P<0.05). The feeling of dryness was more marked with etafilcon A after night wear (50%, CI95% 27-72%) and at the end of the day (50%, CI95% 27-72%) than it was with lotrafilcon A (15%, CI95% 0%-31%) after night wear (P>0.05) and at the end of the day (25%, CI95% 5%-44%, P<0.05). General satisfaction with the lotrafilcon A lens was 3.65 points (CI95% 3-4.2) and with etafilcon A 2.95 points (CI95% 2.5-3.3, P<0.05). Eighty percent (CI95% 62%-98%) of subjects preferred lotrafilcon A (P<0.05) for EW. CONCLUSIONS: In EW, lotrafilcon A contact lenses were more comfortable and led to less dryness after night wear and at the end of the day than etafilcon A contact lenses.