| Abstract: | Reviews the advantages of financing mental health care in the US along the lines of the Canadian single-payer system and argues that the pillars of the Canadian system (accessibility, comprehensiveness, portability, public administration, and universality) are standards a restructured US system could achieve. The merits of including mental health coverage in a basic benefits package are also discussed. The authors believe limits on reimbursement for psychologists in Canada should not keep US psychologists from supporting single-payer proposals because (1) the professional Zeitgeist in the US in 1992 is very different from that of Canada in the late 1960s and (2) Canadian psychologists could have participated but failed to achieve professional consensus on the merits of inclusion in the national health program. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
