Physical Workload in Different Body Postures,While Working Near to,or Below Ground Level

The physical load of different working postures during a light job at low working level was compared while varying the frequency of forward movement and working level. The postures compared were bending, kneeling, squatting and sitting on a low stool. Energy expenditure, heart rate and the increase in heart rate over a five minutos' period were used as parameters. The following conclusions can be drawn. Bending and kneeling require less energy and arc less strenuous, when one hand (arm) is used as a support to balance the trunk. At high forward movement frequencies (more than 4 metres per minute or 5 movements per minute) the bending posture without arm support is loss strenuous than squatting and sitting on a one-legged stool. At low movements frequencies the squatting posture is preferable. Heart rate and energy consumption were slightly higher than that when sitting, but performance and also the gradient of the heart rate were slightly more favourable. The working height, varied from ? 14 cm to + 16 cm in comparison with the floor level, influenced the workload less. A remarkable increase in the work load was observed in the bending position only when the working level was lower than the level of the feet. If work has to be carried out in the ground itself, then squatting appears to be the most favourable position.