| Abstract: | A trial was designed to test the efficacy of vaccination of lambs against field challenge with T. ovis eggs using 3 different levels of pasture contamination. Three concentric paddocks (1.62 hectares each) were used and the inner paddock was heavily contaminated with T. ovis eggs by tethering 2 dogs, experimentally infected with T. ovis, at 5 different points in the paddock over a period of 1 month. Four groups of lambs were used. Sixty lambs, from a property known to be free of T. ovis for 2 years previously, were divided into 2 groups of 30 each; one group was vaccinated with T. ovis culture antigen (vaccinated group=V) while the other was vaccinated with culture medium without antigen (sham-vaccinated group=SV). Thirty mature sheep were obtained from a property with a recent record of T. ovis infection (previous natural exposure to infection group=PNE) and 15 lambs were artificially reared from birth under cestode-egg-free conditions (artificially reared groups= AR). Ten animals from groups V, SV, and PNE, and 5 AR lambs were grazed on each of the 3 concentric paddocks for 6 weeks, and then all animals were slaughtered and their total muscle mass (including heart, diaphragm, tongue and masseters) examined, by slicing, for T. ovis cysticerci. The mean total numbers of T. ovis cysticerci recovered were as follows: Inner paddock, PNE 45.5, AR 47.6, SV 107.8, V 6.5; Middle paddock, PNE 5.2, AR 9.0, SV 8.2, V 0.3; Outer paddock, PNE 2.9, AR 2.8, SV 2.3, V 0.2. There were 4 major conclusions from this study. Firstly, vaccination was more effective than previous natural exposure to infection in preventing establishment of new cysticerci. Secondly, although vaccination effectively reduced the numbers of cysticerci, those that became established were mostly viable at the time of slaughter. In contrast, PNE sheep had greater numbers of cysticerci but the majority were degenerating. Vaccination, therefore, did not seem to stimulate a complete immunological response. Thirdly, the presence of T. hydatigena in lambs did not prevent subsequent infection with T. ovis. Fourthly, T. ovis eggs were dispersed from the inner paddock to the outer paddock. |
