首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国含油气盆地地温-地压系统
引用本文:刘 震 朱文奇  孙 强  金 博  许晓明  张厚福. 中国含油气盆地地温-地压系统[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.7623/syxb201201001
作者姓名:刘 震 朱文奇  孙 强  金 博  许晓明  张厚福
作者单位:1中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室 北京 102249; 2中国石油长城钻探工程公司解释研究中心 北京 100101; 3中海油研究总院 北京 100027
基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2009CB219408)和国家重大科技专项(2008ZX05001和2008ZX05002)资助。
摘    要:地温-地压系统作为盆地流体动力场的耦合,直接控制着油气的运移和聚集。在中国不同类型含油气盆地中,地温-地压系统特征存在很大差异,依据含油气盆地深部和浅部温压系统的斜率关系,划分出3大类地温-地压系统模式:高压型复式温压系统模式(浅部地层压力为静水压力、深度地层压力表现为高压异常)、低压型复式温压系统模式(浅部地层压力为静水压力、深度地层压力表现为低压异常)和单一型温压系统模式(浅部与深部地层压力均为静水压力)。高压型复式温压系统内,浅层系统的斜率分布范围较窄,地区差异小;深层系统的斜率分布范围很宽,地区差异较大。低压型复式温压系统内,浅层系统的斜率分布范围较宽,地区差异很大;深层系统的斜率分布范围较窄,地区差异相对较小。单一型温压系统深、浅层系统的斜率一致且分布比较集中,地区差异不明显。地温-地压系统特征分析表明,高压型复式温压系统内深浅部地层连通性很差,在垂向断裂附近,深层流体向上运移动力很强;低压型复式温压系统内深浅部地层连通性较差,在垂向断裂附近,浅层流体具有向下运移的趋势;单一型温压系统内深浅部地层连通性很好,流体垂向运移动力不足。在中国3大类含油气盆地中,伸展型盆地主要发育高压型复式温压系统,低压型复式温压系统次之;挤压型盆地以高压型复式温压系统为主,也有低压型复式温压系统发育;克拉通盆地发育低压型复式温压系统或高压型复式温压系统。

关 键 词:中国  含油气盆地  复式地温-地压系统  温压系统斜率  油气运移  
收稿时间:2011-06-26
修稿时间:2011-09-24

Characteristics of geotemperature-geopressure systems in petroliferous basins of China
LIU Zhen , ZHU Wenqi , SUN Qiang , JIN Bo , XU Xiaoming , ZHANG Houfu. Characteristics of geotemperature-geopressure systems in petroliferous basins of China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.7623/syxb201201001
Authors:LIU Zhen    ZHU Wenqi    SUN Qiang    JIN Bo    XU Xiaoming    ZHANG Houfu
Affiliation:1(1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource & Prospecting,China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China; 2.Geoscience Center,Greatwall Drilling Company,CNPC,Beijing 100101,China;3.Research Institute, China National Offshore Oil Corporation,Beijing 100027,China)
Abstract:As the coupling of hydrodynamic fields in petroliferous basins, a geotemperature-geopressure system (Geo-TPS) directly controls the migration and accumulation of oil and gas. Studies have showed that characteristics of the Geo-TPS in China differ greatly from one petroliferous basin to another. Based on the relationship of Geo-TPS slopes in shallow and deep formations, three types of Geo-TPS models were put forward: the high-pressure multiple Geo-TPS (HP-MGeo-TPS), the low-pressure multiple Geo-TPS (LP-MGeo-TPS) and the single Geo-TPS (S-Geo-TPS). As for the HP-MGeo-TPS, the slope range of the Geo-TPS is narrower in shallow formations but wider in deep formations. On the contrary, as for the LP-MGeo-TPS, the slope range of the Geo-TPS is wider in shallow formations but narrower in deep formations. And as for the S-Geo-TPS, the slope range of the Geo-TPS is relatively concentrated and regionally identical in both shallow and deep formations. A wider slope range indicates a big variation of the Geo-TPS with different basins, while a narrower slope range means a small change of the Geo-TPS with different basins. The difference of Geo-TPS characteristics suggests that a vertical connectedness in subsurface is better in the S-Geo-TPS than that either in the HP-MGeo-TPS or in the LP-MGeo-TPS. A poor connectedness may lead to an upward migration tendency of deep fluids in the HP-MGeo-TPS but a downward migration tendency of shallow fluids in the LP-MGeo-TPS along vertical fractures. Statistic data show that in China, both the HP-MGeo-TPS and the LP-MGeo-TPS develop well in extensional petroliferous basins; the HP-MGeo-TPS is more common than the LP-MGeo-TPS in compressional basins; and either the LP-MGeo-TPS or the HP-MGeo-TPS occurs in craton basins.
Keywords:China  petroliferous basin  multiple geotemperature-geopressure system  slope of geotemperature-geopressure system  oil and gas migration
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《石油学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《石油学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号