| Abstract: | Offers comments in response to S. Epstein's (see record 1996-12802-001) suggestions for improving the journal review process. Bedeian's concern centers on the question of where in the journal review process detailed editing and reviewing end and ghostwriting begins. The author suggests that journal editors develop and enact practices that protect the integrity of scientific enterprise while respecting the prerogatives and ethics of authorship. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
