| 热水交联与常压蒸汽交联两种工艺的分析比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黎驹,符雨恩. 热水交联与常压蒸汽交联两种工艺的分析比较[J]. 电线电缆, 2007, 0(4): 21-23 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黎驹 符雨恩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 海南威特电气集团海口威特电缆有限公司,海南,海口,570203;海南威特电气集团海口威特电缆有限公司,海南,海口,570203 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对硅烷交联聚乙烯电力电缆的两种交联工艺——热水交联和常压蒸汽交联从基础投资、能量消耗、产品质量、实际感知和缺陷暴露等方面进行分析评价,认为热水交联具有明显的优势。
|
| 关 键 词： | 交联聚乙烯电力电缆 硅烷交联 热水交联 常压蒸汽交联 分析比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-6901（2007）04-0021-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-25 |
Analysis of and Comparison between the Water Curing Method and Normal Pressure Steam Curing Method |
| |
| LI Ju. Analysis of and Comparison between the Water Curing Method and Normal Pressure Steam Curing Method[J]. Wire & Cable, 2007, 0(4): 21-23 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Ju |
| |
| Abstract: | In this paper,the author made a comparison between the water curing method and normal pressure steam curing method,the two silane curing methods,in terms of the basic investment,energy consumption,product quality,comment by the operator and exposed defects.He concluded that the water curing method has remarkable advantages over the steam method. |
| |
| Keywords: | XLPE power cable silane curing water curing normal pressure steam curing analysis of and comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
