Influence of source, time and method of application, and simulated rainfall on recovery of nitrogen fertilizers applied to bromegrass |
| |
Authors: | S. S. Malhi |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Bag Service 5000, T0C 1S0 Lacombe, Alberta, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Four field experiments were conducted in central Alberta to determine influence of the N source, time and method of application and simulated rainfall on the recovery of15N-labelled fertilizers applied to meadow bromegrass (Bromus biebersteinii Roem and Shultz. cv. Regar) in plants (topgrowth plus roots) and in soil. The first experiment compared two N sources (urea and ammonium nitrate (A.N.)) and six times of application (early fall, late fall, early winter, early spring, late spring and spring-summer split) where N fertilizers were surface-broadcast. Urea gave lower N recovery than A.N., regardless of time of application (on the average by 16.4% in plants and by 18.3% in plants plus soil). For urea, early spring application gave higher N recovery than the other times of application, especially at the Eckville site. For A.N., spring applications gave higher N recovery than fall or early winter applications but N recovery was only slightly greater with early spring than late spring application. The second experiment evaluated methods of N placement (surface-broadcasting and banding). The N recovery in plants increased with subsurface band placement over surface-broadcast by 20.2% for fall application and by 15.5% for spring application. The other two experiments investigated the effect of amount (0, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mm) of simulated rainfall and interval (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 d) between surface urea application and simulated rainfall on N recovery. Simulated rainfall of 10 mm immediately after surface urea application on moist soil increased the N recovery in plants by 8.1–10.7% compared to no simulated rainfall. Delaying simulated rainfall (20 mm) by 4 d after surface urea application decreased the N recovery in plants by 8.7–15.2%. In conclusion, the N recovery improved greatly when urea was placed below the soil surface or with simulated rainfall immediately after surface urea application. |
| |
Keywords: | Ammonium nitrate method of placement 15N-labelled fertilizers Canadian prairie soils |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|