首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of measurement accuracy between two types of wrist goniometer systems
Authors:Per Jonsson  Peter W Johnson
Affiliation:

a Section of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, St. Sigfridsgatan 85, SE41266 Gothenburg, Sweden

b Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington, Box 357234, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

Abstract:Studies have shown that wrist goniometers are prone to measurement errors, particularly due to crosstalk. This study compared two wrist goniometer systems: a commonly used biaxial, single transducer (System A) and a biaxial, two-transducer (System B). Wrist angles, range of movement and crosstalk results were compared. With the wrist in 90° of pronation, eight subjects were placed in 20 different wrist postures between ?40° and 40° of flexion/extension and between ?10° and 20° of deviation.

Relative to System B, System A had larger measurement errors and was more prone to crosstalk. There may be two sources of crosstalk: (1) intrinsic crosstalk associated with the design, application and twisting of the goniometer transducer when on the wrist, and (2) extrinsic crosstalk associated with the anatomy and complex movement of the wrist joint. It appears that the majority of the radial/ulnar crosstalk measured with System A was intrinsic crosstalk due to the twisting of the goniometer transducer.

Keywords:Wrist  Goniometer and accuracy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号