| Abstract: | Through summation tests in conditioned suppression with rats we assessed the effects of distribution of trials across days (Experiment 1) and intertrial interval (ITI) (Experiment 2) on the degree of backward conditioned inhibition established through signaled and unsignaled unconditioned stimuli (USs). Two backward conditioned inhibitory stimuli (CS-s) were established within subjects: One backward CS- followed signaled shocks; the other followed unsignaled shocks. After 12 daily sessions (Experiment 1), the signaled backward CS- was strongly inhibitory and significantly more inhibitory than the unsignaled backward CS-. When the same number of trials occurred in a single long session, performances to both CS-s converged at moderate levels. At the 90-s ITI, (Experiment 2) the signaled and unsignaled backward CS-s were nearly equivalent in effectiveness. When the ITI was 540 s, performances diverged, and signaled backward CS- was substantially more effective; the longer ITI facilitated inhibitory backward conditioning based upon signaled USs but prevented the development of inhibitory backward conditioning based upon unsignaled USs. These functionally opposite effects on backward conditioned inhibition, depending on whether the US was signaled or not, are anticipated by Wagner's "standard operating procedure" (SOP) model of short-term memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) |
