Laparoscopic hernia surgery--status of minimal invasive techniques in a spectrum of surgical indications

Endoscopic surgery led in the nineties to a discussion on surgical treatment of hernias. At the present time there are three groups of operative procedures: the conventional procedure--Shouldice, Bassini--the open tension-free procedure with implantation of a mesh--Lichtenstein, Gilbert-Rutkow--and the endoscopic procedure (predominantly transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP)). The debate on the optimal therapy of hernias is understandable in view of the large number of hernia operations which are carried out. Numerous studies, some randomized, have demonstrated both the advantages and the disadvantages of the individual operative procedures. In addition to the recurrence rate and the complications, the cost factor and the associated socio-economic aspects of the particular operation play an increasingly important role in the decision on the method that should be used. In December 1995 some Austrian surgeons, who concerned themselves with problems of hernia repair already before the definitive introduction of laparoscopic hernia repair in today's surgery, came together on the occasion of a "Consensus Conference". During the meeting a summary of all relevant aspects of the complex of problems was worked out and summarized in a catalog of indications for the different operative interventions. The main statement was that the traditional open surgery, which can be performed under local anesthesia is indicated for an unilateral primary hernia. In case of an unclear finding at the contralateral side, as well as in case of a recurrent hernia, an endoscopic procedure is indicated. Meanwhile the Hernia Forum of Zürs ("Zürser Hernienforum") was founded. The function of this forum is the realization of a prospective randomized study for hernia repair in Austria.